Food & Beverage Market Research

Winning shelf position now depends on decisions made months before a product ships. Food and beverage market research is where those decisions are validated, priced, and de-risked against a consumer who reformulates loyalty with every trip.

The category leaders separating themselves right now share one habit. They treat sensory data, concept data, and shopper behavior as one integrated signal, not three siloed studies. That integration is what turns a promising formulation into repeat purchase.

티콘텐츠 목록

What Food and Beverage Market Research Actually Delivers

Food and beverage market research is the disciplined measurement of product acceptance, concept appeal, and category behavior across defined consumer segments, using sensory testing for food products, concept evaluation, and shopper analytics to guide reformulation, launch, and pricing decisions.

The best programs answer four questions in sequence. Will the concept pull trial. Does the product deliver against the concept at first bite. Does it hold up over the intended shelf life. Does it earn a second purchase at the price the P&L requires. Skip any one and the launch carries hidden risk that surfaces in velocity data six months late.

Sensory Testing for Food Products: Where Category Leaders Invest

Sensory testing for food products has moved well past hedonic scaling on a nine-point scale. Serious operators run a stack: descriptive analysis panels calibrated for the category, discrimination tests such as triangle and duo-trio to confirm reformulations are truly parity or truly differentiated, and QDA (quantitative descriptive analysis) to build a sensory map against competitive benchmarks.

Where flavor and texture analysis pays off is in the interaction effects. A plant-based burger can score acceptable on flavor and acceptable on texture yet fail on the combined mouthfeel-flavor release curve. Temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) surfaces this. Standard monadic testing does not.

According to SIS International Research, plant-based protein launches that validated the sensory gap against animal-protein benchmarks using descriptive panels before concept testing achieved materially stronger repeat rates than launches that relied on consumer acceptance scores alone. The gap is rarely flavor. It is texture memory and finish.

식품 및 음료 산업 배달 시장 조사

Consumers can now order from a broad selection of eateries with a single tap of their mobile phones. Online food delivery platforms continue to increase accessibility and choice. New online platforms are racing to capture consumers and new markets. Platforms are springing up across Asia, the Americas, the Middle East, and Europe. The industry of transporting restaurant meals to the home is experiencing rapid change.

편의성은 글로벌 온라인 음식 배달 앱 시장을 이끄는 중요한 요소입니다. 미주 지역은 가장 광범위한 온라인 주문형 음식 배달 서비스 시장입니다. 이러한 수요는 스마트폰 보급률이 높기 때문입니다. 이러한 서비스 시장은 남미에서도 성장하고 있습니다. 해당 지역에서는 여러 스타트업이 음식 배달을 위한 성공적인 주문형 솔루션을 구축하고 있습니다. 이들 스타트업은 남미의 젊고 인맥이 좋은 인구를 활용하고 있습니다.

The food delivery app is an appealing solution than calling a restaurant. Food delivery apps avoid customer pain points of being put on hold for extended periods when calling in during the traditional food delivery ordering process. Consumers also benefit from convenience as opposed to the traditional tedious process of calling out their credit card information. Apps open up consumers to trying new foods and restaurants. The downside is that they reduce human-to-human contact.

What Drives Food and Beverage Purchases

Share of consumers who say each factor has a strong impact on their food and drink choices, with taste standing clearly above every other driver

Source 1: Food and Health Survey on Purchase Drivers
Source 2: SIS International Food and Beverage Taste Testing

식품 및 음료 시장의 주요 업체

특정 회사와 단체는 소비자 선호도에 영향을 미치고 업계 표준을 설정하며 혁신을 주도하면서 이 업계에서 상당한 시장 점유율을 확보해 왔습니다.

• 다국적 식품 및 음료 기업: Nestlé, PepsiCo, The Coca-Cola Company와 같은 회사가 업계를 선도하고 있습니다. 이들의 방대한 자원을 통해 철저한 식품 시장 조사를 수행하여 글로벌 소비자 동향을 이해하고 지역 선호도에 맞는 제품을 출시함으로써 앞서 나갈 수 있습니다.

• 패스트푸드 체인점: Global chains such as McDonald's, Starbucks, and KFC significantly influence the food market. Their vast reach enables them to introduce new items that cater to local tastes in different countries, often setting food trends.

• 슈퍼마켓 및 거대 소매업체: Walmart, Carrefour 및 Tesco는 소비자 구매 행동을 형성하는 데 중추적인 역할을 합니다. 제품 배치, 판촉 및 재고 결정은 소비자 구매 습관에 대한 광범위한 식품 시장 조사 통찰력을 직접적으로 반영합니다.

• 전문 건강식품 브랜드: 건강과 웰니스에 대한 관심이 높아지면서 Beyond Meat 및 Chobani와 같은 브랜드가 주목을 받고 있습니다. 이들의 명성이 높아지면서 건강에 관심이 있는 소비자가 주도하는 틈새 시장을 이해하고 활용하는 데 있어 식품 시장 조사의 중요성이 강조됩니다.

• 지역 및 장인 생산자: 다국적 거대 기업만큼 시장 점유율이 넓지는 않지만, 종종 장인이 만든 유기농 제품에 중점을 두는 현지 생산자들은 식품 시장에서 특별한 위치를 차지하고 있습니다. 풀뿌리 식품 시장 조사를 통해 수집된 현지 선호도, 전통 및 재료에 대한 이해를 통해 진정성 있고 독특한 판매 제안을 갖춘 제품을 만들 수 있습니다.

• 무역 협회 및 조직: 상업 단체는 아니지만 세계보건기구(WHO), 식량농업기구(FAO)와 같은 단체는 세계 식량 소비, 영양, 식량 안보 패턴에 관한 보고서와 연구를 발표함으로써 식품 시장 조사에 기여합니다. 그들의 통찰력은 종종 정책을 형성하고 시장 동향에 영향을 미칩니다.

The Global Food and Beverage Market by Region

How the world's largest consumer industry, worth close to ten trillion dollars, is divided across regions and what is driving each

Region	시장 규모	Share	성장	What Drives It
아시아 태평양	~$4.0T	41%	Very high	Urbanization, rising incomes, and rapid e-commerce and food delivery uptake
북아메리카	~$3.0T	31%	Strong	High spending power, product innovation, and demand for health and convenience
유럽	~$2.3T	23%	Steady	Quality and sustainability standards, clean label, and premium positioning
라틴 아메리카	~$0.3T	3%	Moderate	A young population and growing adoption of packaged and healthier foods
Middle East & Africa	~$0.2T	2%	Moderate	Population growth, urbanization, and expanding modern retail

Source 1: Global Food and Beverage Market by Region
Source 2: SIS International Food and Beverage Market Research
Figures are approximate. Regional shares and totals vary by source and definition. Sizes are derived from a global market of roughly ten trillion dollars.

New Food Product Development Research: The Sequence That Reduces Launch Risk

New food product development research works when the sequence is disciplined. Concept screening first, using sequential monadic design to avoid halo bias. Product optimization second, using JAR (just-about-right) scales with penalty analysis to isolate which attributes to dial up or down. Concept-product fit third, because a concept that overpromises against the actual sensory experience kills repeat.

Penalty analysis for just-about-right scale data is the underused instrument in this stack. It quantifies the mean drop in overall liking caused by each attribute being "too much" or "too little." That translates directly into R&D priorities. Sweetness too high by 12 percent of respondents costing 0.4 liking points is a different decision than 30 percent costing 1.1 points.

Consumer Taste Test Methodologies: CLT, IHUT, and When Each Wins

The central location test versus in-home use test question is not academic. It decides whether you measure controlled first impression or real-world consumption context. Both matter. The choice depends on the decision at hand.

Method	가장 적합한	Trade-off
Central Location Test (CLT)	Controlled sensory comparison, blind benchmarking, reformulation validation	Artificial context, single exposure
In-Home Use Test (IHUT)	Repeat intent, usage occasion capture, package interaction	Less controlled, longer field time
Hybrid CLT plus IHUT	Launch-critical SKUs, private label taste parity claims	Higher cost, requires panel continuity

원천: SIS International Research

For private label taste parity testing, blind triangle tests followed by branded IHUT is the defensible protocol. It answers both the technical question (are they discriminable) and the commercial question (does the shopper accept parity at the price gap offered). Retailers pursuing premium private label programs rely on this exact structure.

AI 블로그 배너

Food Concept Testing Services and the Clean Label Question

Clean label consumer perception is measured, not assumed. Shoppers do not read ingredient decks the way food scientists do. They read heuristics: length of list, recognizable words, front-of-pack cues, and category expectations. CATA (check-all-that-apply) methodology paired with projective mapping surfaces which claims actually shift purchase intent and which are table stakes that earn no premium.

The pattern across categories is consistent. "No artificial" claims lift trial. "Added functional" claims lift price acceptance. "Organic" lifts neither in mainstream categories once household income and prior category behavior are controlled. Food concept testing services that skip the segmentation layer will overstate claim value across the board.

Shelf-Life Sensory Benchmarking and the Repeat Purchase Cliff

Shelf-life sensory benchmarking is the discipline most often shortchanged in launch timelines. Products are tested at production and again at expiration. The interesting failures happen in between. Accelerated shelf-life testing (ASLT) combined with descriptive panel calibration at multiple points in the aging curve identifies the week when the product crosses a consumer-detectable threshold.

SIS International's sensory work across beverage and packaged food categories indicates that products failing at the midpoint of stated shelf life rarely fail on safety or spoilage. They fail on flavor drift, aroma decay, or textural change that consumers perceive but do not articulate. Repeat purchase drops before the complaint arrives.

About SIS Food and Beverage Market Research

SIS International Research는 글로벌 시장 조사 및 전략 분야의 선도적인 제공업체입니다. 30년 이상의 경험을 바탕으로 SIS는 가장 정확하고 업데이트된 결과를 제공하기 위해 포괄적인 1차 및 2차 연구를 수행합니다. 120개 이상의 국가에서 활동 중인 SIS는 최첨단 포커스 그룹과 심층 인터뷰 시설을 소유 및 운영하여 고객에게 우수한 데이터와 답변을 제공합니다. 우리는 해당 업무 분야의 전문가인 우수한 채용 인력으로 광범위한 데이터베이스를 유지 관리합니다.

SIS has extensive experience in the food industry market research, particularly in areas of interest including market segmentation, taste testing, customer loyalty, and market opportunity. Additional services range from trend analysis to mobile application development. For a full list of our experience in the food industry market research, we have provided 이전에 함께 일한 이력서 및 고객 샘플.

Where the Category Is Moving

Three shifts are reshaping how leading manufacturers commission food and beverage market research. Private label has moved from price play to quality play, which raises the bar on taste parity evidence. The sober-curious shift is creating white space in adult non-alcoholic categories where sensory expectations are borrowed from alcohol, not soft drinks. Functional ingredients are being evaluated on delivered experience, not label claim, which puts sensory back at the center of positioning.

In structured expert interviews SIS conducts with category managers, R&D leads, and quality professionals across food and beverage retailers and manufacturers in the US, UK, and India, the consistent theme is compression of the concept-to-shelf cycle without compression of the validation stack. The firms holding both are winning.

The SIS Perspective

SIS International Research has conducted food and beverage market research across more than 135 countries for four decades, spanning CLT and IHUT programs, descriptive panel builds, concept testing services, shelf-life sensory benchmarking, and B2B expert interviews with category buyers and quality leaders. The work sits inside client launch decisions, reformulation gates, and private label parity claims. That is the standard the category now requires.

자주 묻는 질문

What is food and beverage market research?

Food and beverage market research measures product acceptance, concept appeal, and category behavior among defined consumer segments. It combines sensory testing, concept evaluation, and shopper analytics to support reformulation, launch, pricing, and claim decisions before a product reaches shelf.

What is the difference between a central location test and an in-home use test?

A central location test controls the serving protocol, temperature, order, and palate cleansing, which makes it the right instrument for blind comparison and reformulation sign-off. An in-home use test places product in the real consumption occasion over several days, which is where repeat intent, package interaction, and usage frequency become measurable. Launch-critical SKUs usually run both.

How many respondents does a taste test need?

Sample size follows the decision, not convention. Consumer hedonic cells typically run 100 to 150 category users per product to detect meaningful liking differences. Discrimination tests such as triangle and duo-trio follow the power tables in ISO 4120, which often means 55 to 100 assessors depending on the difference being ruled in or out. Trained descriptive panels operate with 8 to 12 calibrated assessors, because reliability comes from calibration rather than volume.

How long does an in-home use test take to field?

Placement length is set by the usage cycle being observed. Single-serve beverages can be evaluated inside a week. Products with a build-up effect, such as coffee systems, supplements, or pet food, generally require two to four weeks of placement to capture wear-out or acclimation. Recruitment, shipping, compliance checks, and diary completion add to the total, and multi-country programs need buffer for customs clearance on product shipments.

What drives the cost of a food and beverage research program?

Five factors move the budget more than anything else. Incidence rate of the target user, number of cells and product rotations, whether product is shipped to homes or served on site, the number of markets and languages, and the depth of the sensory instrument. A trained descriptive panel build costs more than a consumer hedonic read, and it answers a question the consumer read cannot.

How are taste parity and preference claims substantiated?

Comparative taste claims in the United States are challenged through the National Advertising Division, so the protocol has to survive review, not just produce a favorable number. Parity claims rest on discrimination testing under ISO 4120 or ASTM E1885. Preference claims rest on blind paired preference among several hundred category users, projectable to the claimed population, with documented protocol and analysis plan set before fielding.