Développer votre entreprise au Japon

---

Abenomics, mesures de relance et résurgence du marché d’exportation japonais pour les entreprises de taille moyenne

Au début de l’année 2015, le gouvernement japonais a approuvé $29 milliards (3 500 milliards de yens) de dépenses de relance. Cela fait partie de l'initiative « Abenomics » en cours du Premier ministre Shinzo Abe, conçue pour revigorer la troisième économie mondiale et fournir des capitaux aux petites et moyennes entreprises japonaises. Le Premier ministre Abe a reçu un mandat lors des récentes élections et profite de cet élan pour actualiser sa politique économique. 

Avec la diminution de l'inflation, la baisse du taux de chômage et la réduction des déficits commerciaux, l'Institut de recherche Daiwa a récemment indiqué qu'il pensait que la récession au Japon était peut-être terminée. Certains économistes entrevoient une tendance à la croissance qui a débuté fin 2014 lorsque les investissements des entreprises et exportations a commencé à accélérer. Le gouvernement s'attend à une croissance économique d'au moins 2,7 pour cent en 2015, ce qui laisse présager une reprise des économies régionales et une amélioration du bien-être social des citoyens. Parallèlement, le produit intérieur brut réel devrait croître de 1,5 pour cent au cours de l'exercice en cours.

Le 14 janvier^ème, le gouvernement japonais a dévoilé un projet de budget général pour 2015, un montant record de 96 340 milliards de yens, soit environ $1 000 milliards de dollars américains.  Dans le même temps, les recettes fiscales (qui devraient atteindre 54 000 milliards de yens {$444 milliards} pour cet exercice) devraient être à leur plus haut niveau depuis 1991, grâce au retour en force des grandes entreprises ces derniers mois. De nombreux économistes estiment que le plan de relance économique du Premier ministre Abe a entraîné une remontée du moral national et qu'il y a de nombreuses raisons d'être optimiste sur le plan économique pour l'année à venir.

Abenomics, du nom du Premier ministre Shinzo Abe, repose sur le principe des « trois flèches » qui comprend des mesures de relance budgétaire, des réformes structurelles et un assouplissement des politiques monétaires. Cette combinaison de dépenses publiques, de reflation et de politiques de croissance vise à réanimer l'économie moribonde du Japon et à promouvoir l'investissement privé. Le Premier ministre Abe a agi rapidement sur les deux premières « flèches », en annonçant un généreux projet de loi de relance et en nommant Haruhiko Kuroda à la tête de la Banque du Japon, lui donnant pour mandat d'utiliser l'assouplissement quantitatif pour atteindre un objectif d'inflation annuelle de 2 %. taux.

Certains citent les bénéfices d'exploitation récents et importants de Toyota comme un signe que les politiques économiques ont un effet positif et que cela en résulte hausse des exportations pourrait modifier la psychologie intérieure du Japon en ce qui concerne l’économie.  Le Premier ministre Abe souhaite augmenter les salaires, rendre le Japon plus compétitif, investir dans la R&D et mettre en place une structure budgétaire durable. La baisse des prix du pétrole et la hausse des salaires devraient favoriser une augmentation des dépenses des consommateurs et une augmentation des bénéfices des entreprises. Ces revenus supplémentaires favoriseront un regain d'intérêt pour l'investissement et favoriseront la croissance des dépenses en capital.

Le 15 janvier^ème, the Bank of Japan stated that wage gains of at least 1 percent will be required in fiscal 2015 to keep Japan’s consumer spending and its economic resurgence alive. A failure to achieve this goal could result in BOJ not meeting its ambitious target of 2 percent inflation, thereby necessitating additional stimulus. Prime Minister Abe has been in meetings with labor and business leaders to orchestrate the needed pay increases.

Entreprises de taille moyenne will receive ¥1.2 trillion in much-needed support through the new stimulus package including ¥600 billion for the promotion of regional industries, petites entrepriseset les travaux publics. Les efforts de relance en cours sont soutenus positivement par les politiques Abenomics et par le récente reprise des exportations japonaises, mostly to the United States, where the economy, while not fully recovered, has shown marked and continuing improvement. A weakened yen and escalating stock prices, aided by monetary easing and Abenomics, have also greatly benefited exports.

Japans MID Market Exporting: How Industrial Leaders Capture Share

Japan rewards patience, precision, and supplier discipline. For mid-market industrial exporters, it remains one of the most defensible growth corridors in Asia. The barriers that frustrate casual entrants are the same barriers that protect committed ones.

Japans MID Market Exporting succeeds when global manufacturers treat the country as a qualification market, not a volume market. Win the specification, and the volume follows across Southeast Asia, where Japanese OEMs and trading houses still anchor procurement standards.

Why Japans MID Market Exporting Rewards Specification-Led Strategy

Japanese buyers evaluate suppliers against an installed base logic that Western exporters routinely underestimate. The buyer is not comparing your product to a competitor. The buyer is comparing your component to the one already qualified into the bill of materials a decade ago.

This is the mechanism behind the long sales cycle. Total cost of ownership calculations include line-down risk, audit history, and the cost of retraining maintenance staff. Price concessions rarely move the decision. Documented process control does.

Komatsu, Fanuc, and Daikin run supplier qualification audits that scrutinize statistical process control data, sub-tier traceability, and engineering change notification protocols. Mid-market exporters who arrive with ISO certificates alone lose to suppliers who arrive with capability indices, PPAP files, and a named quality engineer who speaks Japanese technical vocabulary.

The Trading House Channel Still Governs Industrial Access

Mitsubishi Corporation, Mitsui, Sumitomo, Itochu, and Marubeni remain decisive intermediaries for industrial categories ranging from specialty chemicals to precision components. The sogo shosha do not simply distribute. They underwrite credit, hold inventory buffers, and absorb foreign exchange risk that Japanese end-users will not carry directly.

Mid-market exporters who bypass the trading house in pursuit of direct margin frequently discover that direct relationships exist only on paper. Reorder velocity stalls. Engineering support requests route back through the trading partner that was excluded.

According to SIS International Research, mid-market industrial exporters who structure their first three years around a single anchor trading house and two to three lighthouse end-users compress qualification timelines by roughly half compared to peers pursuing direct accounts in parallel.

Aftermarket Revenue Is Where Margin Lives

The installed base in Japan is large, aging, and meticulously maintained. Industrial exporters focused only on new equipment sales miss the structural opportunity. Aftermarket revenue strategy in Japan, including spares, retrofit kits, and predictive maintenance contracts, often delivers two to three times the gross margin of original equipment.

Hitachi, Yaskawa, and Mitsubishi Electric have built durable service revenue on this principle. Foreign exporters can attach to it by offering retrofit-compatible modules, certified rebuild programs, and condition monitoring data that integrates with existing CMMS platforms. Installed base analytics, properly applied, identify which plants are approaching capital cycle decisions before the RFQ goes out.

What Drives Successful Market Entry Assessments

Generic country reports do not move qualification forward. The exporters who scale fastest commission targeted intelligence on three questions: which end-users have open specification slots, which trading houses carry the relevant category, and which technical objections surface in Japanese-language engineering reviews.

SIS International’s B2B expert interviews with senior procurement and engineering leaders across Japanese industrial OEMs consistently identify after-sales responsiveness, Japanese-language technical documentation, and on-soil engineering presence as the three factors that separate shortlisted suppliers from qualified ones.

The pattern holds across automotive tier suppliers, factory automation, semiconductor capital equipment, and process industries. Exporters who localize technical documentation before the first sales call advance further than those who localize after the first lost bid.

A Framework for Sequencing Entry

Source: SIS International Research

The sequence matters. Exporters who pursue replication before specification is locked produce volume forecasts that procurement teams discount on sight. Exporters who pursue aftermarket before reference accounts exist have nothing to retrofit.

Pricing Discipline and the Yen Question

Japanese industrial buyers tolerate annual price reviews. They do not tolerate surprise. Exporters who index pricing transparently to raw material movements, publish lead-time commitments, and hold them through currency volatility build the trust that produces multi-year supply agreements.

The yen has weakened materially against the dollar and euro over the past several years. This is structurally favorable for foreign exporters whose cost base is yen-denominated through local distribution, and structurally challenging for those invoicing in hard currency. The mid-market exporters gaining share have segmented their pricing by channel, absorbing partial currency exposure where the strategic account justifies it.

Where Mid-Market Exporters Find Asymmetric Advantage

Large multinationals carry overhead that Japanese buyers price into negotiations. Mid-market exporters can offer engineering responsiveness that scaled competitors cannot match: the application engineer on the call, the modification approved in days, the prototype shipped in two weeks. This is the structural advantage, and it compounds across the keiretsu network once one anchor account validates it.

The categories where this advantage shows up most clearly include specialty materials, precision motion components, sensors and instrumentation, sub-system integration, and service-intensive capital equipment. In each, Japanese end-users have signaled willingness to qualify foreign suppliers when domestic alternatives consolidate or exit.

The Intelligence That Moves the Decision

SIS International’s competitive intelligence engagements across Japanese industrial sectors have repeatedly shown that the difference between a stalled entry and a successful one is not strategy quality. It is the granularity of account-level intelligence: which engineer owns the specification, which competitor is up for re-qualification, and which platform is approaching a design refresh.

This is the work that ethnographic plant visits, structured B2B expert interviews, and trading house mapping produce. It is not available in syndicated reports. It is the operational layer that turns a Japans MID Market Exporting strategy from a slide deck into a signed purchase order.

The Outlook for Industrial Exporters

Japanese industrial procurement is opening selectively. Demographic pressure on supplier networks, the reshoring conversation around semiconductors and batteries, and aggressive automation investment are creating qualification windows that did not exist a decade ago. The exporters who move now, with rigorous specification work and patient channel construction, will hold positions that latecomers will not dislodge.

Japans MID Market Exporting is not a quick-win market. It is a market where disciplined intelligence, named methodology, and three-year commitment compound into defensible share. The window is open. The qualification clock is the only constraint.

À propos de SIS International

SIS International propose des recherches quantitatives, qualitatives et stratégiques. Nous fournissons des données, des outils, des stratégies, des rapports et des informations pour la prise de décision. Nous menons également des entretiens, des enquêtes, des groupes de discussion et d’autres méthodes et approches d’études de marché. Contactez nous pour votre prochain projet d'étude de marché.