Far crescere il tuo business in Giappone

Abeconomia, stimoli e un mercato di esportazione giapponese in ripresa per le aziende di medie dimensioni
All’inizio del 2015, il governo giapponese ha approvato $29 miliardi (3,5 trilioni di yen) in spese di stimolo. Fa parte dell'iniziativa “Abenomics” in corso del Primo Ministro Shinzo Abe, progettata per rinvigorire la terza economia più grande del mondo e fornire capitali alle piccole e medie imprese giapponesi. Il primo ministro Abe ha ricevuto il mandato nelle recenti elezioni e sta sfruttando questo slancio per attuare le sue politiche economiche.
Con l’allentamento dell’inflazione, il calo del tasso di disoccupazione e la riduzione del deficit commerciale, il Daiwa Institute of Research ha recentemente riferito di ritenere che la recessione in Giappone potrebbe essere finita. Alcuni economisti intravedono un trend di crescita iniziato alla fine del 2014, quando gli investimenti aziendali e esportazioni cominciò ad accelerare. Il governo prevede che l'economia si espanderà almeno del 2,7% nel 2015, puntando ad una ripresa delle economie regionali e ad un miglioramento del benessere sociale per i cittadini. Nel frattempo, si prevede che il prodotto interno lordo reale crescerà dell’1,5% nell’anno fiscale in corso.
Il 14 gennaioth, il governo giapponese ha presentato un progetto di bilancio generale record per il 2015 pari a 96,34 trilioni di yen, pari a circa $1 trilioni di dollari. Allo stesso tempo, le entrate fiscali (che si prevede raggiungeranno i 54mila miliardi di yen {$444 miliardi} quest’anno fiscale) dovrebbero essere al livello più alto dal 1991, a causa del forte ritorno delle grandi aziende negli ultimi mesi. Molti economisti ritengono che il progetto del Primo Ministro Abe per la ripresa economica abbia portato ad un aumento del morale nazionale e che ci siano molti motivi per essere ottimisti economici nel prossimo anno.
Abeconomia, che prende il nome dal primo ministro Shinzo Abe, si basa sul principio delle “tre frecce” che comprende stimoli fiscali, riforme strutturali e allentamento delle politiche monetarie. Questa combinazione di spesa pubblica, reflazione e politiche di crescita è progettata per rianimare l’economia moribonda del Giappone e promuovere gli investimenti privati. Il Primo Ministro Abe ha agito rapidamente sulle prime due “frecce”, annunciando il generoso disegno di legge di stimolo e nominando Haruhiko Kuroda alla guida della Banca del Giappone, dandogli il mandato di utilizzare l’allentamento quantitativo per raggiungere un obiettivo di inflazione annua del 2% valutare.
Alcuni citano i recenti e considerevoli profitti operativi della Toyota come un segno che le politiche economiche stanno avendo un effetto positivo e che le conseguenti aumento delle esportazioni potrebbe alterare l’effettiva psicologia interna del Giappone per quanto riguarda l’economia. Il primo ministro Abe vuole aumentare i salari, rendere il Giappone più competitivo, investire in ricerca e sviluppo e fornire una struttura fiscale che possa essere sostenuta nel tempo. Il calo dei prezzi del petrolio e l’aumento dei salari dovrebbero promuovere un aumento della spesa da parte dei consumatori e un aumento dei profitti per le imprese. Questi guadagni aggiuntivi promuoveranno un rinnovato interesse per gli investimenti e favoriranno la crescita delle spese in conto capitale.
Il 15 gennaioth, the Bank of Japan stated that wage gains of at least 1 percent will be required in fiscal 2015 to keep Japan’s consumer spending and its economic resurgence alive. A failure to achieve this goal could result in BOJ not meeting its ambitious target of 2 percent inflation, thereby necessitating additional stimulus. Prime Minister Abe has been in meetings with labor and business leaders to orchestrate the needed pay increases.
Imprese di medie dimensioni will receive ¥1.2 trillion in much-needed support through the new stimulus package including ¥600 billion for the promotion of regional industries, piccole imprese, e lavori pubblici. Gli sforzi di ripresa in corso vengono aiutati positivamente dalle politiche dell’Abenomics e dal recente ripresa delle esportazioni giapponesi, mostly to the United States, where the economy, while not fully recovered, has shown marked and continuing improvement. A weakened yen and escalating stock prices, aided by monetary easing and Abenomics, have also greatly benefited exports.
Japans MID Market Exporting: How Industrial Leaders Capture Share
Japan rewards patience, precision, and supplier discipline. For mid-market industrial exporters, it remains one of the most defensible growth corridors in Asia. The barriers that frustrate casual entrants are the same barriers that protect committed ones.
Japans MID Market Exporting succeeds when global manufacturers treat the country as a qualification market, not a volume market. Win the specification, and the volume follows across Southeast Asia, where Japanese OEMs and trading houses still anchor procurement standards.
Why Japans MID Market Exporting Rewards Specification-Led Strategy
Japanese buyers evaluate suppliers against an installed base logic that Western exporters routinely underestimate. The buyer is not comparing your product to a competitor. The buyer is comparing your component to the one already qualified into the bill of materials a decade ago.
This is the mechanism behind the long sales cycle. Total cost of ownership calculations include line-down risk, audit history, and the cost of retraining maintenance staff. Price concessions rarely move the decision. Documented process control does.
Komatsu, Fanuc, and Daikin run supplier qualification audits that scrutinize statistical process control data, sub-tier traceability, and engineering change notification protocols. Mid-market exporters who arrive with ISO certificates alone lose to suppliers who arrive with capability indices, PPAP files, and a named quality engineer who speaks Japanese technical vocabulary.
The Trading House Channel Still Governs Industrial Access
Mitsubishi Corporation, Mitsui, Sumitomo, Itochu, and Marubeni remain decisive intermediaries for industrial categories ranging from specialty chemicals to precision components. The sogo shosha do not simply distribute. They underwrite credit, hold inventory buffers, and absorb foreign exchange risk that Japanese end-users will not carry directly.
Mid-market exporters who bypass the trading house in pursuit of direct margin frequently discover that direct relationships exist only on paper. Reorder velocity stalls. Engineering support requests route back through the trading partner that was excluded.
According to SIS International Research, mid-market industrial exporters who structure their first three years around a single anchor trading house and two to three lighthouse end-users compress qualification timelines by roughly half compared to peers pursuing direct accounts in parallel.
Aftermarket Revenue Is Where Margin Lives
The installed base in Japan is large, aging, and meticulously maintained. Industrial exporters focused only on new equipment sales miss the structural opportunity. Aftermarket revenue strategy in Japan, including spares, retrofit kits, and predictive maintenance contracts, often delivers two to three times the gross margin of original equipment.
Hitachi, Yaskawa, and Mitsubishi Electric have built durable service revenue on this principle. Foreign exporters can attach to it by offering retrofit-compatible modules, certified rebuild programs, and condition monitoring data that integrates with existing CMMS platforms. Installed base analytics, properly applied, identify which plants are approaching capital cycle decisions before the RFQ goes out.
What Drives Successful Market Entry Assessments
Generic country reports do not move qualification forward. The exporters who scale fastest commission targeted intelligence on three questions: which end-users have open specification slots, which trading houses carry the relevant category, and which technical objections surface in Japanese-language engineering reviews.
SIS International’s B2B expert interviews with senior procurement and engineering leaders across Japanese industrial OEMs consistently identify after-sales responsiveness, Japanese-language technical documentation, and on-soil engineering presence as the three factors that separate shortlisted suppliers from qualified ones.
The pattern holds across automotive tier suppliers, factory automation, semiconductor capital equipment, and process industries. Exporters who localize technical documentation before the first sales call advance further than those who localize after the first lost bid.
A Framework for Sequencing Entry
| Phase | Primary Activity | Decision Output |
|---|---|---|
| Qualification | Lighthouse account targeting, trading house mapping | Anchor partner selected |
| Specification | Engineering audits, sample submissions, PPAP | Designed-in status on one platform |
| Replication | Reference selling across keiretsu and tier-one peers | Three to five active accounts |
| Aftermarket | Service contracts, retrofit programs, parts pricing | Recurring margin layer |
Source: SIS International Research
The sequence matters. Exporters who pursue replication before specification is locked produce volume forecasts that procurement teams discount on sight. Exporters who pursue aftermarket before reference accounts exist have nothing to retrofit.
Pricing Discipline and the Yen Question
Japanese industrial buyers tolerate annual price reviews. They do not tolerate surprise. Exporters who index pricing transparently to raw material movements, publish lead-time commitments, and hold them through currency volatility build the trust that produces multi-year supply agreements.
The yen has weakened materially against the dollar and euro over the past several years. This is structurally favorable for foreign exporters whose cost base is yen-denominated through local distribution, and structurally challenging for those invoicing in hard currency. The mid-market exporters gaining share have segmented their pricing by channel, absorbing partial currency exposure where the strategic account justifies it.
Where Mid-Market Exporters Find Asymmetric Advantage
Large multinationals carry overhead that Japanese buyers price into negotiations. Mid-market exporters can offer engineering responsiveness that scaled competitors cannot match: the application engineer on the call, the modification approved in days, the prototype shipped in two weeks. This is the structural advantage, and it compounds across the keiretsu network once one anchor account validates it.
The categories where this advantage shows up most clearly include specialty materials, precision motion components, sensors and instrumentation, sub-system integration, and service-intensive capital equipment. In each, Japanese end-users have signaled willingness to qualify foreign suppliers when domestic alternatives consolidate or exit.
The Intelligence That Moves the Decision
SIS International’s competitive intelligence engagements across Japanese industrial sectors have repeatedly shown that the difference between a stalled entry and a successful one is not strategy quality. It is the granularity of account-level intelligence: which engineer owns the specification, which competitor is up for re-qualification, and which platform is approaching a design refresh.
This is the work that ethnographic plant visits, structured B2B expert interviews, and trading house mapping produce. It is not available in syndicated reports. It is the operational layer that turns a Japans MID Market Exporting strategy from a slide deck into a signed purchase order.
The Outlook for Industrial Exporters

Japanese industrial procurement is opening selectively. Demographic pressure on supplier networks, the reshoring conversation around semiconductors and batteries, and aggressive automation investment are creating qualification windows that did not exist a decade ago. The exporters who move now, with rigorous specification work and patient channel construction, will hold positions that latecomers will not dislodge.
Japans MID Market Exporting is not a quick-win market. It is a market where disciplined intelligence, named methodology, and three-year commitment compound into defensible share. The window is open. The qualification clock is the only constraint.
A proposito di SIS Internazionale
SIS Internazionale offre ricerca quantitativa, qualitativa e strategica. Forniamo dati, strumenti, strategie, report e approfondimenti per il processo decisionale. Conduciamo anche interviste, sondaggi, focus group e altri metodi e approcci di ricerca di mercato. Contattaci per il tuo prossimo progetto di ricerca di mercato.


