快餐和饮料市场研究经验

SIS 是一家领先的市场研究公司。了解我们过去的经验。

• 组织了两个焦点小组来品尝一系列早餐三明治。
• Conducted a global menu change study in over 14 countries covering Western, Central, and Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America
• 对亚洲和中东部分国家的站点位置进行了市场可行性研究
• Conducted a site location study in Greece, Jakarta, Indonesia, and Manila, Philippines for the potential for fast food outlets
• 为墨西哥一家快餐连锁店进行了竞争情报研究
• 为墨西哥一家快餐连锁店进行了多项选址研究
• 在印第安纳州特定地点的汉堡王门店对消费者进行拦截，以确定他们对汉堡王服务的满意程度
• 与儿童进行焦点小组讨论，以确定快餐连锁店的促销品
• 对食品和快餐行业的信息技术支出进行了研究
• Conducted focus groups in the Middle East to determine menu changes for a fast food firm
• 在超过 14 个国家开展焦点小组讨论，以确定全球广告活动
• Snack food desk research 学习
• 针对洛杉矶和纽约的冰沙消费者进行了一次焦点小组讨论
• Conducted a qualitative study testing new menu concepts for fast food in three different markets
• Conducted a research project on crisp/chips and focused on brand positioning and brand lines.
• 进行了一项关于丹麦奶酪的研究
• Conducted a research study regarding the chewing gum market
• Conducted a focus group with Russian immigrants in the U.S. regarding soft drinks
• Conducted a research study to find out the success of Korean Food Fairs
• 进行了一项定量研究，以了解对某主要咖啡品牌的满意度和意愿

Resume of Experience in Fast Food Beverage Industry: How SIS International Drives QSR Growth

Quick-service restaurant brands win or lose on three signals: taste parity, throughput economics, and loyalty program engagement. SIS International’s Resume of Experience in Fast Food Beverage Industry reflects four decades of work helping operators read those signals across markets where consumer preferences diverge sharply by city, not country.

The brands gaining share are the ones treating sensory testing, screener precision, and loyalty app behavior as connected disciplines rather than separate vendor purchases. That integration is where the upside sits.

What the Resume of Experience in Fast Food Beverage Industry Demonstrates

SIS work spans concept screening for new menu platforms, central location tests (CLTs) for limited-time offers, ethnographic studies inside drive-thru and dine-in formats, and B2B expert interviews with franchisees, supply chain leads, and category buyers. The methodologies map to specific commercial decisions: launch sequencing, regional rollout prioritization, and price-pack architecture.

SIS International Research has conducted taste testing and screener-driven recruitment for QSR clients across Indonesia, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Spain, Australia, Poland, Germany, and the Netherlands, with quotas calibrated to spice tolerance, dining frequency, and competitive set familiarity rather than generic demographics. That recruitment discipline is what separates a defensible product test from a directional one.

The work covers chicken platforms, beverage line extensions, breakfast daypart expansion, plant-based protein integration, and loyalty program redesign. Each engagement uses a different blend of QDA (quantitative descriptive analysis), JAR scaling, paired comparison, and CATA methodology depending on whether the question is product fit, competitive parity, or claim substantiation.

Sensory Methodology Choices That Shape QSR Launch Outcomes

Most QSR product failures trace back to a methodology mismatch, not a product flaw. A triangle test answers whether consumers can detect a reformulation. It does not answer whether they prefer it. Brands that swap a syrup, oil, or chicken supplier and run only discrimination testing miss the penalty analysis that would have flagged the texture or aftertaste objection before national rollout.

The stronger pattern: pair hedonic scaling with JAR (just-about-right) diagnostics, then layer penalty analysis to quantify which attributes pull overall liking down. For limited-time offers with tight launch windows, temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) reveals whether sweetness, heat, or umami carries the experience at first bite versus finish. That distinction drives advertising claims and menu board copy.

In SIS International’s CLT work for chicken platform tests across Jakarta and Dubai, spice tolerance screening combined with sequential monadic design surfaced regional preference splits that aggregate national data had masked, particularly between Emirati, Arabic expat, and Asian expat segments within a single trade area. Those splits change store-level menu mix forecasts by double digits.

Loyalty Program Research and the Mobile App Engagement Question

QSR loyalty has shifted from punch cards to behavioral data assets. The brands extracting value (Starbucks, Chick-fil-A, Domino’s, McDonald’s, Chipotle) treat their app as a pricing and personalization engine, not a discount channel. The research question is no longer “do members visit more often.” It is which offer architecture moves frequency without eroding ticket.

SIS in-depth interviews (IDIs) with loyalty members across Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Spain, Australia, Poland, Germany, and the Netherlands have documented the gap between stated and revealed preference on app features. Members say they want personalized offers. Behavior shows they redeem generic free-item thresholds at higher rates. That gap matters for CRM investment prioritization.

The strongest loyalty research designs combine pre-screened mobile app users with conjoint exercises on offer structure (points multiplier versus dollars-off versus tiered status) and follow with diary studies measuring actual redemption. Self-reported usage alone produces a flattering and misleading dataset.

Competitive Intelligence and the B2B Side of Fast Food

The Resume of Experience in Fast Food Beverage Industry includes substantial B2B work that operator-side teams often underweight: franchisee sentiment studies, supplier qualification audits, and certification market sizing. SIS market analysis for the International Society of Beverage Technologists (ISBT) on a Beverage Technologist certification program illustrates the B2B layer, where employer-driven adoption depends on quality assurance and product development hiring patterns inside bottlers and chain operators.

Franchisee research is where competitive intelligence pays back fastest. Franchisees see equipment failure rates, labor model strain, and supply chain substitution decisions before corporate dashboards register them. Structured expert interviews with multi-unit operators reveal margin pressure points that consumer surveys never surface.

The SIS QSR Research Stack

Source: SIS International Research

What Distinguishes the SIS Approach

Three things show up consistently in the SIS Resume of Experience in Fast Food Beverage Industry. First, screener precision. Recruiting 200 respondents who match category usage, competitive frequency, and spice or sweetness tolerance produces a different read than 800 general-population respondents. Second, in-market fieldwork rather than panel-only data, particularly in Southeast Asia, the Gulf, and Latin America where cultural segmentation inside cities drives outcomes. Third, integration of sensory, behavioral, and B2B evidence in a single decision document.

The Resume of Experience in Fast Food Beverage Industry also reflects continuity. The same senior researchers who designed concept tests for QSR clients a decade ago are running the loyalty app and plant-based protein work now. That institutional memory compresses learning curves on every new engagement.

Where the Upside Sits for Fortune 500 QSR Operators

The growth opportunity for category leaders is not another menu innovation cycle. It is connecting sensory data, loyalty behavior, and franchisee operating reality into one evidence base that supports pricing, daypart, and trade area decisions simultaneously. Brands running these as separate procurement events leave margin and share on the table.

SIS International’s Resume of Experience in Fast Food Beverage Industry is a working portfolio, not a credentials list. The methodologies travel across categories, geographies, and decision types because the underlying discipline (screen tightly, test the right question, integrate the evidence) holds across them.

关于 SIS 国际

SIS 国际 提供定量、定性和战略研究。我们提供决策所需的数据、工具、战略、报告和见解。我们还进行访谈、调查、焦点小组和其他市场研究方法和途径。 联系我们 为您的下一个市场研究项目提供帮助。