RegTech – Regulierungstechnologie

---

“RegTech,” dubbed “the new FinTech,” has rapidly ascended from complete obscurity into prominence. RegTech is pretty much what it says on the tin (at the risk of sounding too simple). It is the use of new technology to enable the delivery of regulatory requirements. This wedding of technology and regulation is not new. But it is becoming more and more important as levels of regulation rise and attention to data and reporting increases.

The increase in investment in RegTech is because of companies having to deal with growing levels of regulation that have come into force in 2012. These include Know Your Customer, Anti Money Laundering, Basel III, the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), and the second Payment Services Directive (PSD2).

RegTech-Chancen

Companies are boosting their RegTech applications and systems so they can do more. They are enhancing the current tools in ways that release substantial advances in data management and automation. These improvements are informing breakthrough enhancements across the complete range of asset managers’ back-office functions – and more and more middle-office processes as well.

Experten sind sich einig, dass RegTech bei der Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) eine gute Rolle spielen wird. Es wird Unternehmen dabei helfen, einen intelligenteren Weg zu finden, um die Herausforderungen der Regulierung zu bewältigen. RegTech bietet auch die Möglichkeit zur Know-Your-Customer-Berichterstattung (KYC) und zur Einhaltung der Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO).

RegTech Regulatory Technology: How Leading Enterprises Turn Compliance Into Competitive Advantage

RegTech regulatory technology has shifted from a compliance cost center to a measurable source of operating margin. The firms extracting the most value treat it as infrastructure, not software procurement. They engineer compliance into product design, customer onboarding, and capital allocation rather than bolting it on after audit findings.

The opportunity is structural. Regulatory complexity is rising faster than headcount budgets, and the gap is being closed by machine-readable rules, real-time transaction monitoring, and API-driven reporting. The winners are using that gap to move faster than competitors, not just to stay clean.

Why RegTech Regulatory Technology Now Carries Strategic Weight

Three forces converged to elevate RegTech from middle-office tooling to board-level concern. First, supervisors moved to structured digital reporting under regimes including DORA in the EU, the SEC’s machine-readable filings, and the FCA’s Digital Regulatory Reporting pilots. Second, sanctions velocity accelerated, making static screening obsolete. Third, ISO 20022 migration in payments forced banks to rebuild data pipelines that compliance teams could finally use.

The downstream effect is that compliance data, once trapped in PDFs and spreadsheets, is now query-able at the transaction level. Firms that built the plumbing early are running KYC refresh cycles in days rather than quarters and pricing risk with precision their peers cannot match.

According to SIS International Research, operators in tightly supervised markets including the UK, Sweden, and Germany consistently report lower fraud loss ratios than peers in loosely regulated jurisdictions, but the cost differential narrows sharply once RegTech is deployed at the onboarding layer rather than post-transaction. The implication for VP-level leaders is direct. Investment in upstream verification compounds; investment in downstream remediation does not.

The Architecture That Separates Leaders From Followers

Conventional compliance stacks treat each obligation as a separate workflow. KYC sits in one system, transaction monitoring in another, regulatory reporting in a third, and adverse media screening in a fourth. The architecture leading firms have adopted instead is a unified entity graph, where customer, counterparty, beneficial owner, and transaction data resolve to a single identifier and every control queries that graph.

This matters because false positives, the dominant cost driver in transaction monitoring, fall sharply when context is shared across controls. Firms running unified graphs report alert-to-case conversion rates two to four times higher than siloed peers. The analyst time freed up moves to investigations that actually matter to supervisors.

Named examples illustrate the pattern. ComplyAdvantage and Quantexa built businesses on graph-native screening. Chainalysis did the same for crypto exposure. Behavox applied the model to communications surveillance. The common thread is not the algorithm. It is the data model underneath.

Where the Margin Hides: Onboarding, Monitoring, Reporting

Three RegTech regulatory technology domains carry disproportionate ROI for enterprise buyers.

Perpetual KYC. Replacing periodic refresh with event-driven review cuts review volume by half or more while improving risk coverage. The savings are real because analyst hours are the largest line item in financial crime budgets.

Behavioral transaction monitoring. Rules-based systems generate alert volumes that exceed investigative capacity. Behavioral models calibrated to peer-group baselines, rather than absolute thresholds, materially reduce noise. Supervisors have grown comfortable with the approach when model governance is documented to SR 11-7 standards.

Machine-readable regulatory reporting. Firms publishing structured data directly to supervisors avoid the reconciliation tax that consumes finance and risk teams in the days before each filing. The early adopters are pricing this capability into their cost-to-serve.

Source: SIS International Research

What Vertical SaaS Buyers Are Getting Right

Outside financial services, the strongest RegTech adoption is happening in vertical SaaS platforms embedding compliance directly into the customer workflow. Veeva did this for life sciences submissions to the FDA and EMA. Workiva did it for SEC filings and ESG disclosures. AuditBoard did it for SOX and internal audit. The product-led growth model in vertical SaaS rewards platforms that remove regulatory friction, not just operational friction.

The unit economics tell the story. Vertical SaaS players with embedded compliance modules show net revenue retention well above horizontal peers because the switching cost is no longer the software. It is the validated control environment built around it.

SIS International’s B2B expert interviews with regulatory affairs leaders across automotive markets in Germany, France, and Italy indicate that homologation and N-CAP compliance workflows are following the same trajectory, with OEMs demanding API-level integration between supplier compliance evidence and internal type-approval systems. The pattern is consistent across regulated industries. Compliance data is becoming a product feature, not a back-office output.

The SIS View on Vendor Selection

Most RegTech procurement processes optimize for feature checklists. The better question is whether the vendor’s data model will survive the next regulatory shift. PSD3, MiCA, the EU AI Act, and SEC climate disclosure rules each demand schema changes that brittle systems cannot absorb without rebuilds.

SIS International applies a structured win/loss analysis and competitive intelligence methodology to RegTech vendor evaluations for Fortune 500 buyers, focusing on three diligence axes: regulatory roadmap alignment, data model extensibility, and supervisor acceptance in the buyer’s primary jurisdictions. Vendors that pass all three are rare. Those that pass one or two are common and frequently sold by procurement teams measuring on price.

The SIS RegTech Maturity Model

Four stages describe where most enterprises sit and where the value migrates next.

Stage 1, Reactive. Compliance is manual, audit-driven, and reconciled at period end.

Stage 2, Tooled. Point solutions cover KYC, monitoring, and reporting in silos.

Stage 3, Integrated. A unified entity graph powers shared controls and supervisor-ready reporting.

Stage 4, Embedded. Compliance is a product feature, monetized in customer-facing workflows and priced into the offering.

Movement from Stage 2 to Stage 3 is where most of the financial benefit accrues. Movement to Stage 4 is where competitive separation becomes durable.

The Decision Ahead for VP-Level Buyers

RegTech regulatory technology budgets are shifting from operating expense to capitalized platform investment. The firms making that shift first are the ones treating compliance as a moat rather than a tax. The decision facing VP-level leaders is not whether to invest. It is whether the vendor architecture chosen this cycle will still be defensible two regulatory regimes from now.

The firms that get this right will compound the advantage. Faster onboarding wins customers. Lower false-positive rates free analyst capacity. Machine-readable reporting earns supervisor trust that translates into capital relief. The RegTech regulatory technology stack is becoming a balance sheet asset.

Über SIS International

SIS International bietet quantitative, qualitative und strategische Forschung an. Wir liefern Daten, Tools, Strategien, Berichte und Erkenntnisse zur Entscheidungsfindung. Wir führen auch Interviews, Umfragen, Fokusgruppen und andere Methoden und Ansätze der Marktforschung durch. Kontakt für Ihr nächstes Marktforschungsprojekt.