Technology Market Research That Asks the Buyer, Not the Vendor
Vendor pitch decks overstate adoption curves. Analyst reports aggregate survey data from respondents who may never have evaluated the product. SIS International interviews the IT procurement directors, CIOs, and engineering leaders who actually select, deploy, and renew enterprise software. We conduct win/loss analysis, vendor evaluation studies, and go-to-market research across 135+ countries so technology companies understand how buyers really make decisions.

Six Research Lanes for Entreprises technologiques
Win/Loss Analysis for Enterprise Software
SIS interviews the prospects who evaluated your product and chose a competitor, and the ones who chose you over alternatives. We document the decision criteria, the evaluation process, the competitive shortlist, and the specific moment the deal tilted. Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Workday all run structured win/loss programs because CRM pipeline data shows what happened but not why. A cybersecurity vendor discovered through SIS win/loss interviews that procurement teams consistently ranked them first on technical evaluation but lost the deal at the CISO level, where the competitor’s managed services positioning resolved a staffing concern the product-only pitch could not address.
SaaS Go-to-Market Research
SIS interviews prospective buyers in the target segment to validate go-to-market assumptions before launch investment. We test pricing models (per-seat, usage-based, platform fee), sales motion fit (self-serve, inside sales, enterprise field sales), and competitive positioning with the actual personas who sign purchase orders. A vertical SaaS company entering the construction management category used SIS research to discover that their usage-based pricing model, which worked in software development, confused construction project managers who budget by project, not by consumption. The pricing architecture was rebuilt before the GTM launched.
AI Adoption and Readiness Assessment
Vendor projections for enterprise AI adoption do not match what IT leaders report when interviewed independently. SIS conducts structured interviews with CIOs, VP Engineering, and data science leads to assess actual AI deployment status: which use cases are in production versus pilot, what integration barriers stalled adoption, and where ROI has been demonstrated versus assumed. Microsoft Copilot, Google Duet AI, and Anthropic Claude are entering enterprise evaluations simultaneously. SIS documents how procurement teams are structuring those evaluations and what criteria determine which platform wins the deployment.
Platform Ecosystem and API Monetization Research
Platform companies like Twilio, Stripe, and Shopify generate revenue through developer adoption and ecosystem partner engagement. SIS interviews developers, ISV partners, and integration architects to map ecosystem health: API adoption friction, documentation quality, developer experience satisfaction, and the competitive pull from alternative platforms. A payments infrastructure company used SIS research to identify that their API documentation gap, not their feature set, was the primary reason mid-market developers chose a competitor’s platform during the integration evaluation phase.
Vendor Evaluation and Software Selection Research
SIS interviews enterprise buyers who have recently completed a vendor selection process in a specific software category: ERP, CRM, ITSM, cybersecurity, data platform, or collaboration. We document the evaluation framework, the shortlist criteria, the proof-of-concept process, and the decision-maker hierarchy. The output is a buyer decision map that product marketing and sales enablement teams use to align positioning with how the buyer actually evaluates. Gartner Magic Quadrants show where vendors are placed. SIS research shows how buyers use those quadrants and what other factors override them.
Net Revenue Retention and Churn Intelligence
SIS interviews churned customers and accounts that downgraded to identify the specific triggers: product gaps, integration failures, support dissatisfaction, pricing changes, or competitive displacement. We also interview expanded accounts to understand what drove upsell and cross-sell. The output is a churn driver analysis and expansion driver analysis that customer success and product teams use to prioritize retention investments. A data analytics platform client discovered through SIS interviews that their largest churn cohort left not because of product dissatisfaction but because their champion left the organization, and no account management process existed to rebuild the internal relationship.
What SIS Delivers to Technology Product and GTM Teams
15-20 interviews per quarter with prospects who evaluated your product: wins and losses. Each interview documents the evaluation process, shortlist criteria, competitive comparison, and the specific decision trigger. Delivered as a quarterly intelligence package with trend data across deal segments.
Interviews with prospective buyers in the target segment to validate pricing model, sales motion, and competitive positioning before GTM investment. The output is an evidence-based GTM architecture document that replaces internal assumptions with buyer-sourced data on purchase process, budget authority, and evaluation criteria.
Structured interviews with CIOs, VP Engineering, and data science leads documenting actual deployment status, integration barriers, and ROI evidence for specific AI and software platforms. The deliverable separates vendor-reported adoption from buyer-reported reality across named enterprise accounts.
Interviews with churned, downgraded, and expanded accounts to reconstruct the actual decision timeline and isolate root cause. Product gaps, integration failures, champion departure, competitive displacement, and pricing triggers are separated and quantified. Customer success and product teams receive a prioritized retention investment roadmap.
THE SIS DIFFERENCE
Nos offres de services comprennent :



