Communication Services Market Research | SIS International

Comunicação Services Market Research

Pesquisa e Estratégia de Mercado Internacional da SIS

Os serviços de comunicação dizem respeito a indivíduos, organizações e outras entidades. É como essas entidades trocam informações, ideias ou mensagens entre si. Esses serviços podem abranger várias tecnologias, plataformas e métodos.

Por exemplo, os serviços de comunicação baseados em voz são um dos métodos. Isso inclui chamadas telefônicas tradicionais e serviços de protocolo de voz sobre Internet (VoIP). Também inclui outras ferramentas de comunicação baseadas em voz. Exemplos são chat de voz em jogos online, reuniões virtuais e mensagens de voz.

Existem também serviços de comunicação baseados em texto. Isso inclui mensagens de texto, e-mail, mensagens instantâneas, aplicativos de bate-papo e plataformas de mídia social. Também consiste em todas as outras formas de comunicação escrita utilizadas para troca de mensagens. Ele compartilha informações e permite a interação com outras pessoas.

Outro método são os serviços de comunicação baseados em vídeo. Isso inclui videochamadas, videoconferências e mensagens de vídeo. Também inclui outras plataformas que permitem comunicação por vídeo em tempo real ou gravada. Os serviços de comunicação baseados em vídeo funcionam tanto para indivíduos quanto para grupos.

Os serviços de comunicação colaborativa são outro tipo. Isso inclui ferramentas e plataformas que permitem a colaboração de equipes ou grupos. Eles também permitem que as partes se comuniquem em tempo real. Exemplos são software de gerenciamento de projetos, plataformas de compartilhamento de documentos e ferramentas de colaboração em equipe.

Existem também mídias sociais e serviços de networking. Isso inclui plataformas de mídia social, fóruns online e outras comunidades online. Estas comunidades facilitam a comunicação e a interação entre indivíduos ou grupos com interesses comuns.

Os serviços de radiodifusão e comunicação de mídia incluem televisão, rádio, podcasts e outras plataformas de mídia. Essas plataformas divulgam informações, notícias ou entretenimento para um público amplo.

Os serviços de comunicação baseados na Internet incluem ferramentas de comunicação que dependem da conectividade com a Internet. Exemplos são webconferência, VoIP, e-mail e outros métodos de comunicação online.

Os serviços de comunicação móvel incluem serviços de comunicação concebidos para dispositivos móveis. Exemplos são aplicativos de mensagens móveis, chamadas de voz e videochamadas.

Os serviços de comunicação de emergência incluem serviços de comunicação utilizados durante emergências. Exemplos são sistemas de transmissão de emergência e sistemas de alerta público. Esses serviços também incluem outros métodos de comunicação usados para notificações e respostas de emergência.

Por que os serviços de comunicação são importantes?

Communication Services Market Research: How Leading Enterprises Identify Growth Pockets in Connectivity

Communication services market research has shifted from tracking ARPU and churn to mapping where enterprise spend migrates as networks, software, and devices converge. The buyers have changed. The decision criteria have changed. The winners are the firms that read the shift early.

For VP-level leaders inside carriers, equipment manufacturers, managed service providers, and platform vendors, the question is no longer market size. It is which segments expand, which contract, and where margin actually accrues across the value chain.

What Communication Services Market Research Now Covers

The category extends far beyond voice and data. It now spans private 5G deployments, SD-WAN and SASE adoption, UCaaS and CCaaS platforms, network APIs, fixed wireless access, satellite backhaul, and the embedded connectivity layer inside industrial equipment. Each segment has its own buyer, its own procurement cycle, and its own competitive logic.

Effective communication services market research segments demand by use case rather than by product. A logistics fleet buying connected telematics is not the same buyer as a hospital deploying private wireless for medical IoT, even when the underlying SIM and spectrum profile look identical. Conflating them produces sizing models that overstate addressable market by a factor of two or more.

The terminology matters. Total cost of ownership now includes spectrum lease, integration cost, lifecycle SLAs, and security posture, not only monthly recurring charge. Installed base analytics, particularly across legacy MPLS contracts approaching renewal, is where most growth pockets sit hidden.

Where Enterprise Communication Spend Is Actually Migrating

Three movements define the current cycle. First, network functions are virtualizing onto cloud-native infrastructure, compressing margins for traditional hardware vendors and opening share for software-led entrants. Cisco, Nokia, and Ericsson are restructuring portfolios around this. Smaller players such as Celona and Athonet have built defensible positions in private 5G by selling to plant managers, not CIOs.

Second, the buyer has moved. Operational technology leaders inside manufacturing, mining, ports, and utilities now control budgets that used to sit with telecom procurement. Their evaluation criteria reward determinism, uptime, and integration with existing PLCs and SCADA systems. Vendors selling on bandwidth and price lose these deals.

Third, hyperscalers entered the network layer. AWS Wavelength, Azure Private MEC, and Google Distributed Cloud Edge changed how enterprises think about latency, sovereignty, and where compute lives relative to the radio. Carriers that treat hyperscalers as channel partners outperform those that treat them as competitors.

What the Best Communication Services Research Programs Do Differently

Conventional vendor reports rely on shipment data and analyst surveys. They produce defensible sizing but miss the why. The firms making the right capital allocation decisions run primary research against the actual buyer, then triangulate against bill of materials economics and OEM procurement patterns.

According to SIS International Research, B2B expert interviews with network architects, plant operations leaders, and CFOs at industrial buyers consistently surface a gap between stated vendor preference and actual purchase behavior. Stated preference favors incumbent carriers. Actual contracts increasingly route through systems integrators and managed service providers who bundle connectivity with outcomes.

SIS International’s competitive intelligence work across communications equipment supply chains in North America, Western Europe, and East Asia indicates that win-rate differentials between top and bottom quartile vendors correlate more strongly with reference-account density in the buyer’s vertical than with technical specification leadership. The implication for product marketing is direct. Vertical proof points beat feature lists.

The SIS Communication Services Opportunity Matrix

A useful framing for portfolio review separates segments along two axes: buyer migration velocity and margin durability.

Segment Buyer Migration Velocity Margin Durability Strategic Posture
Private 5G for industrial High High Invest in vertical proof
SASE and SD-WAN High Medium Capture during MPLS renewal
UCaaS commodity tier Low Low Harvest, do not reinvest
Network APIs (CAMARA) Early High potential Build developer pipeline
Fixed wireless access Medium Medium Geographic selectivity
Satellite IoT backhaul Medium High Partner, do not build

Source: SIS International Research

Methodologies That Surface Decision-Grade Insight

Sizing studies anchored only in secondary sources tend to repeat each other. The differentiated work uses four inputs in combination.

Structured B2B expert interviews with named buyer roles produce the demand signal. Network architects, OT directors, and procurement leads each see a different slice of the decision. Interviewing one without the others yields a partial picture. Sample frames of forty to sixty interviews per geography, stratified by vertical, are typically sufficient for directional confidence.

Competitive intelligence on supplier economics provides the supply signal. Bill of materials decomposition on radio units, optical transport, and CPE clarifies where margin actually sits and which suppliers are price-takers. This is where reshoring feasibility for components such as RF front-ends becomes relevant to forecast accuracy.

Market entry assessments for new geographies require regulatory mapping against spectrum allocation, local content requirements, and data sovereignty rules. India, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Germany each impose distinct conditions that change the unit economics of any deployment.

Voice of the Cliente programs against the installed base close the loop. Renewal economics, expansion behavior, and competitive displacement risk surface only when current customers are interviewed against a structured framework rather than NPS surveys.

Where Growth Pockets Sit for the Next Cycle

Three opportunities stand out for enterprises with the analytical rigor to act on them. Private wireless for mid-market manufacturing remains under-penetrated relative to greenfield logic. Network API monetization through frameworks such as GSMA Open Gateway is at the developer-acquisition stage that mobile app stores were at fifteen years ago. Aftermarket revenue strategy on connected industrial equipment, where the OEM owns the SIM and the data, is reshaping how communications spend gets booked.

Each requires evidence the buyer has not yet been asked to provide. That is the work.

Translating Research Into Capital Allocation

Pesquisa e Estratégia de Mercado Internacional da SIS

The output of strong communication services market research is not a deck. It is a defensible answer to three questions: which segments deserve incremental capital, which deserve harvest, and which deserve exit. Boards approve investments when the evidence connects buyer behavior to unit economics to competitive position. Research that stops at market sizing leaves that connection unmade.

SIS has supported these decisions for global communications equipment manufacturers, network operators, and industrial OEMs across 135 countries for over four decades. The methodologies are tools. The judgment about which tool fits which decision is what compounds over time.

Sobre SIS Internacional

SIS Internacional oferece pesquisa quantitativa, qualitativa e estratégica. Fornecemos dados, ferramentas, estratégias, relatórios e insights para a tomada de decisões. Também realizamos entrevistas, pesquisas, grupos focais e outros métodos e abordagens de Pesquisa de Mercado. Entre em contato conosco para o seu próximo projeto de pesquisa de mercado.

Foto do autor

Ruth Stanat

Fundadora e CEO da SIS International Research & Strategy. Com mais de 40 anos de experiência em planejamento estratégico e inteligência de mercado global, ela é uma líder global confiável em ajudar organizações a alcançar sucesso internacional.

Expanda globalmente com confiança. Entre em contato com a SIS Internacional hoje mesmo!

fale com um especialista