{"id":53791,"date":"2024-10-21T23:32:05","date_gmt":"2024-10-22T03:32:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/?page_id=53791"},"modified":"2026-05-05T16:05:40","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T20:05:40","slug":"statische-vs-dynamische-autoklinieken","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/expertise\/marktonderzoek-automobielindustrie\/statische-vs-dynamische-autoklinieken\/","title":{"rendered":"Static vs Dynamic Car Clinics: OEM Method Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"sis-hero-preserved sis-injected-hero\" data-sis-injected=\"hero\">\n<h1 class=\"gb-headline gb-headline-da86504d gb-headline-text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/quantitative-market-research-methods-and-techniques\/\" class=\"sis-link-recovered\" data-sis-recovered=\"1\">Marktonderzoeksmethoden<\/a> for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/global-automotive-sensors-market\/\" class=\"sis-link-recovered\" data-sis-recovered=\"1\">Automobiel<\/a> Research &#8211; Static vs Dynamic Car Clinics<\/h1>\n<figure class=\"gb-block-image gb-block-image-685c36c5\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1456\" height=\"816\" class=\"gb-image gb-image-685c36c5\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Automotive-2.jpg\" alt=\"SIS Internationaal Marktonderzoek &amp; Strategie\" title=\"Automotive (2)\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Automotive-2.jpg 1456w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Automotive-2-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Automotive-2-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Automotive-2-768x430.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Automotive-2-18x10.jpg 18w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1456px) 100vw, 1456px\"><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity is-style-dots\"\/>\n<p>Statische vs. dynamische autoklinieken zijn cruciale onderdelen van marktonderzoek in de auto-industrie. Statische autoklinieken gebruiken focusgroepen om voertuigen te beoordelen, terwijl dynamische autoklinieken testritten van consumenten omvatten. Inzicht in de voordelen en verschillen tussen deze benaderingen kan fabrikanten helpen weloverwogen beslissingen te nemen over auto-ontwerp en -ontwikkeling.<\/p>\n<p>How can automotive manufacturers best understand consumer preferences? One key tool in automotive <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/connected_car_market_research\/\" title=\"Marktonderzoek naar connected auto&#039;s\"  data-wpil-monitor-id=\"2050\">research is car<\/a> clinics, but how do static and dynamic car clinics differ in providing these insights?<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Statische autoklinieken: een overzicht<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Statische autoklinieken zijn populair om feedback van consumenten te verzamelen over nieuwe voertuigmodellen. In een statische kliniek kunnen consumenten auto&#039;s van dichtbij bekijken, hun kenmerken inspecteren en deelnemen aan focusgroepdiscussies. Ze worden doorgaans uitgevoerd in een gecontroleerde omgeving, waar deelnemers feedback kunnen geven over verschillende aspecten van het voertuig, zoals de styling van het exterieur, de kenmerken van het interieur en het algehele ontwerp.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"gb-block-image gb-block-image-99d7f402\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"757\" height=\"564\" class=\"gb-image gb-image-99d7f402\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Car-clinics-4.png\" alt=\"SIS Internationaal Marktonderzoek &amp; Strategie\" title=\"Autoklinieken 4\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Car-clinics-4.png 757w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Car-clinics-4-300x224.png 300w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Car-clinics-4-16x12.png 16w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 757px) 100vw, 757px\"><\/figure>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Gedetailleerde feedback over ontwerp<\/strong>:Bij statische autoclinics kunnen deelnemers de ontwerpelementen van de auto grondig inspecteren en krijgen ze gedetailleerde feedback over de esthetiek van het exterieur, de materialen in het interieur en de algehele ergonomie.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Focusgroepdiscussies<\/strong>Focusgroepen tijdens statische klinieken maken diepgaande discussies tussen deelnemers mogelijk, waardoor onderzoekers inzicht krijgen in de voorkeuren, meningen en verwachtingen van consumenten.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Gecontroleerde omgeving<\/strong>: Statische autoclinics worden gegeven in een gecontroleerde omgeving, waardoor variabelen zoals rijomstandigheden worden uitgesloten en deelnemers zich uitsluitend kunnen concentreren op het uiterlijk en de kenmerken van het voertuig.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h1>Static vs Dynamic Car Clinics: How Leading OEMs Choose the Right Method<\/h1>\n<p>The choice between Static VS Dynamic CAR Clinics shapes what an OEM actually learns about a vehicle before launch. One method isolates perception. The other captures behavior in motion. Confusing the two costs millions in tooling decisions made on the wrong evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Product planners at global automakers face a recurring question: when does showroom-style evaluation suffice, and when does on-road testing become non-negotiable? The answer depends on what decision the research must inform. Design language, interior material perception, and competitive positioning respond well to controlled venue testing. Powertrain feel, ADAS adoption curves, NVH calibration, and ride-handling trade-offs require dynamic conditions.<\/p>\n<h2>What Static and Dynamic Car Clinics Actually Measure<\/h2>\n<p>Static car clinics operate as central location tests. Vehicles sit in a controlled venue. Respondents evaluate exterior styling, interior ergonomics, perceived quality, brand fit, and price acceptance against benchmarked competitors parked alongside. The method draws from CLT discipline: rotation logic, monadic exposure, and forced-choice trade-off exercises.<\/p>\n<p>Dynamic car clinics put respondents behind the wheel. Test loops at proving grounds or closed courses capture acceleration response, brake feel, steering weight, seat comfort over distance, infotainment usability at speed, and ADAS trust formation. The output is behavioral, not declarative. A respondent who says they want firmer suspension in a static survey often prefers the softer setting after a 20-minute drive.<\/p>\n<p>The two methods answer different questions. Static work informs styling sign-off, color and trim strategy, and competitive benchmarking. Dynamic work informs powertrain calibration, chassis tuning, HMI design, and the gap between specification and felt experience.<\/p>\n<h2>When Static Clinics Drive the Strongest Decisions<\/h2>\n<p>Static formats excel when the research question is perceptual. Exterior design freezes happen years before SOP, and styling teams need disciplined preference data across multiple market clusters. A static clinic in Munich, Paris, and Manchester can field 500 respondents against a controlled stimulus set in two weeks. Dynamic fielding at that scale and speed is logistically impossible.<\/p>\n<p>Interior perceived quality is another strong fit. Material grain, switch damping, stitch density, and ambient lighting all register in seated evaluation. Respondents discriminate finely when they can touch surfaces, open compartments, and sit in second-row seats without distraction.<\/p>\n<p>Static clinics also support pricing research with higher fidelity than concept boards. Van Westendorp and conjoint exercises run inside the venue benefit from respondents standing next to the actual vehicle and its named competitors. The price elasticity curve tightens.<\/p>\n<h2>When Dynamic Clinics Are the Only Honest Answer<\/h2>\n<p>Powertrain transition modeling is where static methods fail. EV adoption decisions hinge on regen braking feel, one-pedal driving acceptance, charging interface clarity, and range anxiety under realistic conditions. None of this surfaces in a parked vehicle. The respondent must drive.<\/p>\n<p>ADAS feature acceptance follows the same logic. Lane centering, adaptive cruise, and hands-free highway systems generate trust or distrust within the first ten minutes of use. Static demonstration produces inflated stated preference. Dynamic exposure produces the actual adoption curve.<\/p>\n<p>NVH benchmarking against competitors also requires dynamic protocols. Cabin sound at 70 mph, wind noise at lane-change yaw angles, and tire harshness over coarse asphalt cannot be replicated in a tent.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color:#216896;border-left:3px solid #216896;padding-left:0.5rem;\">SIS International Research has run car clinics across the US, Germany, France, the UK, Brazil, China, Japan, and Russia, and the consistent pattern is that OEMs underspecify dynamic testing for EV and ADAS programs while overspecifying static testing for refresh cycles where the design intent is already locked.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>The Hybrid Protocol Leading OEMs Now Favor<\/h2>\n<p>The strongest programs combine both formats in sequence. Respondents complete a static evaluation first, recording stated preferences on styling, interior, and price. They then drive the same vehicles on a controlled loop. Post-drive, they re-evaluate. The delta between pre-drive and post-drive scores is the most valuable data point in the study.<\/p>\n<p>This stated-versus-revealed gap exposes calibration risk before tooling commits. A vehicle that scores well statically but loses preference dynamically signals a chassis or powertrain issue that must be addressed pre-launch. The reverse pattern, where dynamic exposure lifts preference, often justifies stronger marketing investment in test drives at the dealer level.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table sis-injected-table\" data-sis-injected=\"table\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Decision Type<\/th>\n<th>Static Clinic Fit<\/th>\n<th>Dynamic Clinic Fit<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Exterior styling sign-off<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<td>Low<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Interior perceived quality<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<td>Medium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Pricing and trim strategy<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<td>Low<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Powertrain calibration<\/td>\n<td>Low<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ADAS adoption curves<\/td>\n<td>Low<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NVH benchmarking<\/td>\n<td>Low<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>EV regen and charging UX<\/td>\n<td>Low<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Brand and competitive positioning<\/td>\n<td>High<\/td>\n<td>Medium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p style=\"font-size:11px;color:#666;margin-top:4px;\"><em>Source: SIS International Research<\/em><\/p>\n<h2>Logistics That Determine Clinic Success<\/h2>\n<p>Venue selection drives everything downstream. Static clinics need climate-controlled space, even lighting at 500 lux minimum, and sightline control so respondents see only the assigned stimulus. Dynamic clinics need closed courses, proving grounds, or driver training facilities with insurance carriers willing to write per-event policies on prototype vehicles.<\/p>\n<p>Vehicle procurement separates strong programs from weak ones. Competitive benchmarks must be matched on trim, model year, mileage band, and option content. A test against a base trim competitor when the client vehicle is loaded produces compromised data. Cross-border vehicle movement adds carnet documentation, homologation checks, and insurance riders that smaller fieldwork operations underestimate.<\/p>\n<p>Respondent recruitment is the third pillar. Specifications must include current vehicle ownership, segment intent, purchase timing, and household income brackets aligned to the actual buyer profile. Loose recruitment dilutes the read. <span style=\"color:#216896;border-left:3px solid #216896;padding-left:0.5rem;\">SIS International&#8217;s experience across European automotive clinics indicates that quota tightening on intender status, defined as purchase intent within 12 months, raises the predictive value of preference scores by a meaningful margin compared to general segment owners.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Cultural Calibration in Global Programs<\/h2>\n<p>Cross-market clinics fail when fieldwork treats markets as interchangeable. German respondents interrogate engineering specifications. French respondents weigh aesthetic coherence. UK respondents anchor on running cost and residual value. Chinese respondents prioritize rear-seat experience and infotainment screen real estate. Brazilian respondents weight ground clearance and durability cues.<\/p>\n<p>Stimulus design must accommodate these reading patterns without breaking comparability. The discussion guide, JAR scales where applicable, and trade-off exercises require local cognitive testing before fielding. Translation alone is insufficient.<\/p>\n<h2>The SIS A-TEAM Framework for Clinic Selection<\/h2>\n<p>The choice between Static VS Dynamic CAR Clinics resolves through four questions. What product decision will this research inform? At what stage of the development cycle does the data need to land? Which markets carry the most launch risk? What is the tolerance for stated-versus-revealed preference gaps?<\/p>\n<p>Programs that answer these before scoping fieldwork avoid the most common waste: dynamic budgets spent on questions static methods would have answered faster, and static reads used to greenlight decisions that only dynamic exposure can validate.<\/p>\n<h2>Key Questions<\/h2>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large sis-injected-img\" data-sis-injected=\"img\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1456\" height=\"816\" class=\"gb-image gb-image-debfaa72\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Car-show-car-clinic-14.jpg\" alt=\"SIS Internationaal Marktonderzoek &amp; Strategie\" title=\"Car show car clinic (14)\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Car-show-car-clinic-14.jpg 1456w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Car-show-car-clinic-14-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Car-show-car-clinic-14-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Car-show-car-clinic-14-768x430.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Car-show-car-clinic-14-18x10.jpg 18w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1456px) 100vw, 1456px\"><\/figure>\n<p>Senior product and insights leaders weighing Static VS Dynamic CAR Clinics for upcoming launches should align method to decision, not to budget convenience. The cost differential between formats is small relative to the cost of a mistuned launch.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"about-sis-international\" style=\"font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:#1a3d68;\">Over SIS Internationaal<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/\">SIS Internationaal<\/a> biedt kwantitatief, kwalitatief en strategisch onderzoek. Wij bieden data, tools, strategie\u00ebn, rapporten en inzichten voor besluitvorming. Wij voeren ook interviews, enqu\u00eates, focusgroepen en andere marktonderzoeksmethoden en -benaderingen uit. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/over-sis-internationaal-onderzoek\/contact-sis-international-market-research\/\">Neem contact met ons op<\/a> voor uw volgende marktonderzoeksproject.<\/p>\n<p><!-- sis-hreflang-start -->\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"en-US\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"ar\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/ar\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"zh-CN\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/zh\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"zh-HK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/zh_hk\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"nl-NL\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"fr-FR\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/fr\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"de-DE\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/de\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"it-IT\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/it\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"ja\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/ja\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"ko-KR\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/ko\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"pl-PL\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/pl\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"pt-BR\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/pt\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"es-ES\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/es\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"en\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"zh\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/zh\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"nl\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"fr\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/fr\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"de\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/de\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"it\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/it\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"ko\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/ko\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"pl\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/pl\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"pt\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/pt\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"alternate\" hreflang=\"es\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/es\/expertise\/automotive-market-research\/static-vs-dynamic-car-clinics\/\" \/>\n<!-- sis-hreflang-end --><\/p>\n<section class=\"sis-related-recovered\" data-sis-recovered-section=\"1\">\n<h3>Related SIS Resources<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/expertise\/industrieen\/marktonderzoek-automobielindustrie\/top-automotive-market-research-company\/\" class=\"sis-link-recovered\">marktonderzoek automobielindustrie<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Market Research Methods for Automotive Research &#8211; Static vs Dynamic Car Clinics Static vs dynamic car clinics are crucial components of market research in the automotive industry. Static car clinics use focus groups to assess vehicles, while dynamic car clinics involve consumer test drives. Understanding the advantages and differences between these approaches can help manufacturers &#8230; <a title=\"Static vs Dynamic Car Clinics: OEM Method Guide\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/expertise\/marktonderzoek-automobielindustrie\/statische-vs-dynamische-autoklinieken\/\" aria-label=\"Lees meer over Static vs Dynamic Car Clinics: OEM Method Guide\">Lees meer<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":62607,"parent":11155,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-53791","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/53791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53791"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/53791\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":87440,"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/53791\/revisions\/87440"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11155"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/62607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}