{"id":15242,"date":"2015-04-12T11:07:17","date_gmt":"2015-04-12T11:07:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/?page_id=15242"},"modified":"2026-05-05T16:01:18","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T20:01:18","slug":"etude-de-marche-du-jouet","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/fr\/competence\/etude-de-marche-du-jouet\/","title":{"rendered":"TOY Market Research: How Leading Brands Win"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u00c9tude de march\u00e9 des jouets<\/h1>\n
\"\u00c9tudes<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

TOY Market Research: How Leading Brands Win in a Reshaped Category<\/h1>\n

The toy category has changed shape. Adult collectors now drive a meaningful share of premium SKUs, retailers compress assortments, and licensing cycles set the cadence of demand. TOY market research is the instrument that separates brands compounding share from those reacting to last season’s POS data.<\/p>\n

The winners read three signals at once: the kidult collector economy, the retailer’s shelf logic, and the IP pipeline feeding the next 18 months. Each signal requires a different research instrument. Combining them is where the upside lives.<\/p>\n

The Kidult Segment Is Rewriting Category Management Optimization<\/h2>\n

Adult fans aged 25 to 44 now buy Lego Icons, Hasbro’s Star Wars Black Series, Bandai’s Tamashii Nations, Mattel Creations, and Funko premium tiers at price points that consumer toys rarely sustained a decade ago. The margin profile is closer to collectibles than to mass toys. The repurchase logic is closer to sneakers.<\/p>\n

This shifts shopper journey analytics. Kidult buyers research on YouTube unboxing channels, Reddit subforums, and Instagram before they ever see a shelf. The path to purchase is hobbyist, not parental. Assortment rationalization built on traditional age-grade segmentation will misread this buyer.<\/p>\n

SIS International Research has found, in B2B expert interviews with senior category managers across North American mass and specialty retail, that kidult SKUs sustain higher full-price sell-through and lower markdown exposure than juvenile equivalents in the same brand family, which reframes how trade spend should be allocated within a single license.<\/span><\/p>\n

Retailer Shelf Space Allocation Now Decides Launch Economics<\/h2>\n

Target, Walmart, Amazon, Smyths, and Toys”R”Us ANZ each apply distinct planogram logic. The same SKU can earn endcap placement in one banner and clearance treatment in another within the same quarter. Shelf space allocation is not a downstream consequence of brand strength. It is the upstream determinant of velocity.<\/p>\n

The strongest brands run continuous installed base analytics on their own SKUs across retailers. They monitor facings, price ladders, and adjacency to competing licenses. They feed this back into negotiated joint business plans rather than waiting for the retailer’s category review window.<\/p>\n

Private label competitive threat is real in construction toys, plush, and basic dolls. The defense is not lower price. The defense is licensed IP velocity that private label cannot replicate, paired with shopper research that proves the lift to the buyer in the buyer’s own language.<\/p>\n

Licensing Pipelines and the IP Adjacency Question<\/h2>\n

Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, Nintendo, Pok\u00e9mon Company, and Netflix release content windows that drive 60 to 80 percent of the variance in toy demand for licensed lines. Reading this calendar is core competitive intelligence. Misreading it strands inventory.<\/p>\n

The harder question is IP adjacency. Which audiences cross from one franchise to another, and at what lag. A buyer of Marvel Legends is a probable buyer of Star Wars Black Series. A buyer of Sanrio is a probable buyer of Squishmallows. The crossover is measurable through panel work and concept-product fit testing, and it changes which licenses a portfolio should pursue.<\/p>\n

SIS International’s proprietary research across European and North American toy markets indicates that licensing decisions made on box-office projections alone underperform those triangulated against social listening, collector forum sentiment, and structured concept tests with the actual target buyer cohort.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Methodology Stack That Separates Leaders<\/h2>\n

Leading toy companies run a layered research stack rather than a single instrument. Each layer answers a different question and feeds a different decision.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Research Instrument<\/th>\nPrimary Question<\/th>\nDecision It Informs<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Central location test (CLT)<\/td>\nDoes the product deliver the intended play pattern?<\/td>\nGo\/no-go on tooling commitment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ethnographic research in homes<\/td>\nHow is the toy actually used after purchase?<\/td>\nLine extension and accessory roadmap<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Focus groups with collectors<\/td>\nWhat signals authenticity in this fandom?<\/td>\nPackaging, deco, and tier design<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
B2B expert interviews with buyers<\/td>\nWhat earns shelf space this cycle?<\/td>\nPitch strategy and trade spend<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Online quant with hobbyist panels<\/td>\nHow large is the willing-to-pay segment?<\/td>\nPricing and SKU count<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n

Source: SIS International Research<\/em><\/p>\n

The error most often seen is substituting one layer for another. A CLT cannot answer a pricing question. A survey cannot answer a play-pattern question. The discipline is matching instrument to decision.<\/p>\n

Safety, Compliance, and the Cost of Getting It Wrong<\/h2>\n

EN 71 in Europe, ASTM F963 and CPSIA in the United States, and GB 6675 in China define the floor. The Toy Safety Directive revision, PFAS restrictions, and battery regulations on connected toys raise it further. Compliance is not a research topic on its own, but it constrains every concept screen.<\/p>\n

Brands that fold compliance into early concept-product fit testing avoid the expensive sequence of designing a hit, then discovering it cannot ship to half the addressable market. This is bill of materials optimization done with regulatory filters built in from the first prototype.<\/p>\n

What the Best Toy Companies Do Differently<\/h2>\n

The pattern across the strongest performers is consistent. They treat the kidult buyer as a separate segment with its own research budget. They run continuous shelf intelligence rather than periodic audits. They test licenses against actual buyer cohorts before signing minimum guarantees. They use ethnographic research to find the play patterns that drive repurchase, not just trial.<\/p>\n

They also accept that toys are now a hybrid of consumer goods, entertainment, and collectibles. The research stack reflects that hybrid. Brands that still run toy research as if it were 2005 cede ground to those that do not.<\/p>\n

Where TOY Market Research Compounds Returns<\/h2>\n

The compounding asset is a buyer database that crosses franchises, age cohorts, and price tiers. Brands that build this asset over five years gain a structural read on demand that no single study can deliver. SIS International has supported toy and entertainment clients across the United States, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Japan with the kind of continuous intelligence programs that build this asset.<\/p>\n

TOY market research, done at this depth, is a margin lever rather than a cost line. The brands treating it that way are the ones moving up the category rankings.<\/p>\n

\u00c0 propos de SIS International<\/h2>\n

SIS International<\/a> propose des recherches quantitatives, qualitatives et strat\u00e9giques. Nous fournissons des donn\u00e9es, des outils, des strat\u00e9gies, des rapports et des informations pour la prise de d\u00e9cision. Nous menons \u00e9galement des entretiens, des enqu\u00eates, des groupes de discussion et d\u2019autres m\u00e9thodes et approches d\u2019\u00e9tudes de march\u00e9. Contactez nous<\/a> pour votre prochain projet d'\u00e9tude de march\u00e9.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n

\n

Related SIS Resources<\/h3>\n