{"id":41045,"date":"2022-11-13T03:00:18","date_gmt":"2022-11-13T03:00:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/?page_id=41045"},"modified":"2026-05-05T16:35:54","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T20:35:54","slug":"skalierbare-geschaftsmarktforschung-7-moglichkeiten-zum-aufbau-eines-skalierbaren-geschafts","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/de\/veroffentlichungen\/skalierbare-geschaftsmarktforschung-7-moglichkeiten-zum-aufbau-eines-skalierbaren-geschafts\/","title":{"rendered":"Scalable Business Market Research: 7 Ways to Scale"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Marktforschung f\u00fcr skalierbare Unternehmen: 7 M\u00f6glichkeiten zum Aufbau eines skalierbaren Unternehmens<\/span><\/h1>\n
\"SIS<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n
\n

Die Gr\u00fcndung eines neuen Unternehmens ist immer spannend. Allerdings stehen Sie auch vor einigen Herausforderungen. Eines der Probleme ist, dass Sie sich zwar jetzt auf die Gr\u00fcndung eines kleinen Unternehmens konzentrieren, dieses aber wachsen wird, sobald alles gut l\u00e4uft. Ein skalierbares Unternehmen ist ein Unternehmen, das seine Rentabilit\u00e4t beibehalten oder verbessern kann, wenn das Verkaufsvolumen steigt. Wie k\u00f6nnen Sie also ein skalierbares Unternehmen aufbauen? Hier sind einige Tipps, die Ihnen dabei helfen.<\/p>\n

Die Bedeutung skalierbarer Gesch\u00e4ftsmarktforschung<\/h2>\n

To scale your business, you must perform Scalable Business Market Research<\/a>. This type of market research is one of the best ways<\/a> to investigate and discover how you can make your business more scalable. It will help you figure out what approach works for you. It will show you fast, easy ways to put things in place to improve your scalability.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Scalable Business Market Research: 7 Ways to Build a Scalable Business<\/h1>\n

Scalability is an engineering problem disguised as a growth problem. The companies that compound revenue without compounding cost have done the structural work upstream, before scale was the question.<\/p>\n

Most expansion plans assume the operating model will hold. It rarely does. Unit economics that look healthy at $200M reveal hidden drag at $800M, and the inflection point is almost always invisible without primary evidence from buyers, channels, and supply partners. Scalable Business Market Research 7 Ways to Build a Scalable Business reframes the question: what evidence do you need before adding the next dollar of cost?<\/p>\n

This pillar examines seven structural moves that separate companies built to scale from those built to grow.<\/p>\n

1. Validate Demand Elasticity Before Capacity Commitments<\/h2>\n

Capacity additions in industrial businesses lock in fixed cost for a decade. The decision rests on a demand curve most leadership teams have never actually measured. Stated willingness-to-pay collapses under real procurement pressure, and forecast models built on shipment history miss substitution threats entirely.<\/p>\n

SIS International’s B2B expert interviews across OEM procurement organizations consistently reveal that price sensitivity in industrial categories is non-linear, with sharp inflection points tied to total cost of ownership thresholds rather than unit price.<\/span> Companies that map these inflection points before sanctioning capacity avoid the stranded-asset problem that has crippled chemical, steel, and component manufacturers across multiple cycles. Caterpillar, Trane Technologies, and Atlas Copco have built capacity decisions around installed base analytics rather than order-book extrapolation.<\/p>\n

2. Engineer the Bill of Materials for Volume, Not Prototype<\/h2>\n

The product that wins the first hundred customers is rarely the product that serves the next ten thousand. Engineering teams optimize the prototype. Procurement inherits the bill of materials. The gap between the two is where scalable margin lives.<\/p>\n

Bill of materials optimization is a research discipline. It requires supplier qualification audits across geographies, second-source identification before the primary supplier raises price, and component-level total cost of ownership analysis that includes warranty, returns, and field-service drag. Honeywell and Emerson Electric have institutionalized this through structured supplier intelligence programs that update quarterly.<\/p>\n

3. Build Aftermarket Revenue Before You Need It<\/h2>\n

Aftermarket revenue carries gross margins two to three times higher than original equipment sales in most industrial categories. It also smooths revenue across capex cycles. Companies that treat service as an afterthought leave the highest-margin dollars on the table for independent service providers to capture.<\/p>\n

SIS International’s competitive intelligence work in industrial manufacturing has documented a consistent pattern: independent aftermarket networks capture 40 to 60 percent of service revenue when OEMs delay building captive service capability past the second product generation.<\/span> The window closes faster than most planning cycles assume. Rockwell Automation and Schneider Electric built aftermarket revenue strategy into the original product architecture, embedding sensors and service entitlements at the design stage.<\/p>\n

4. Reshore Decisions Require Reshoring Feasibility Evidence<\/h2>\n

The reshoring conversation has moved from boardroom theory to capital allocation. The evidence base most companies use is thin. Labor cost comparisons miss the full picture: utility rates, permitting timelines, workforce availability at specific skill tiers, supplier proximity, and the regulatory exposure of dual-sourcing arrangements all shape the actual landed cost.<\/p>\n

Reshoring feasibility studies that hold up under board scrutiny combine site-level primary research with supplier qualification audits and predictive maintenance sizing for the new operating environment. The companies executing reshoring well, including Intel, Micron, and several specialty chemical manufacturers, treated the decision as a multi-year intelligence program rather than a single feasibility memo.<\/p>\n

5. Treat Channel Economics as a Research Problem<\/h2>\n

Distribution partners are the largest single variable in scalable B2B revenue. Channel margin, inventory turns, technical capability, and competing-line conflict all change as the business grows. The channel structure that fits a $300M company chokes a $1B company.<\/p>\n

Win\/loss analysis at the channel level reveals what aggregate sales data hides: which distributors close on technical merit, which close on price concession, and which lose deals the manufacturer never sees. This intelligence reshapes territory design, rebate structure, and direct-versus-indirect mix decisions. It cannot be extracted from CRM data alone.<\/p>\n

6. Predictive Maintenance and Connected Equipment as Scaling Levers<\/h2>\n

Predictive maintenance sizing is now a competitive intelligence discipline, not a product feature decision. Customers buying connected equipment are not buying sensors. They are buying uptime guarantees backed by service-level commitments. The companies winning these contracts have built the data infrastructure to price risk accurately.<\/p>\n

Installed base analytics, when combined with structured customer interviews, reveal which failure modes drive the largest customer cost and which warrant investment in remote monitoring. ABB, Siemens, and GE Vernova have used this evidence base to convert transactional equipment sales into multi-year service contracts with predictable recurring revenue.<\/p>\n

7. Build the Intelligence Function Before You Need the Decision<\/h2>\n

The seventh structural move is the one most leadership teams underestimate: standing up a market intelligence capability before the decision pressure arrives. Companies that commission research only when a deal is on the table consistently make worse decisions than companies that maintain continuous intelligence on customers, competitors, and supply markets.<\/p>\n

Across four decades of B2B engagements in 135 countries, SIS International has observed that the highest-performing industrial scalers run quarterly voice-of-customer programs, annual competitive intelligence refreshes, and market entry assessments commissioned 18 to 24 months ahead of capital deployment.<\/span> The cost of this discipline is a fraction of one stranded capacity decision.<\/p>\n

The SIS Industrial Scalability Matrix<\/h2>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Dimension<\/th>\nPre-Scale Signal<\/th>\nScale-Ready Signal<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Demand Evidence<\/td>\nOrder book extrapolation<\/td>\nElasticity curves from primary research<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bill of Materials<\/td>\nSingle-source critical components<\/td>\nQualified second sources, TCO modeled<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aftermarket<\/td>\nReactive service organization<\/td>\nService entitlements designed into product<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Channel<\/td>\nAggregate sales data<\/td>\nWin\/loss intelligence at deal level<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Intelligenz<\/td>\nProject-based research<\/td>\nContinuous VOC and CI programs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n

Source: SIS International Research<\/em><\/p>\n

Why This Matters Now<\/h2>\n

Industrial buyers are consolidating procurement, demanding TCO transparency, and shifting toward outcome-based contracts. The companies positioned to scale are the ones that have already built the evidence base to support these conversations. Scalable Business Market Research 7 Ways to Build a Scalable Business is not a checklist. It is the structural argument for treating intelligence as infrastructure.<\/p>\n

\u00dcber SIS International<\/h2>\n

SIS International<\/a> bietet quantitative, qualitative und strategische Forschung an. Wir liefern Daten, Tools, Strategien, Berichte und Erkenntnisse zur Entscheidungsfindung. Wir f\u00fchren auch Interviews, Umfragen, Fokusgruppen und andere Methoden und Ans\u00e4tze der Marktforschung durch. Kontakt<\/a> f\u00fcr Ihr n\u00e4chstes Marktforschungsprojekt.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n

\n

Related SIS Resources<\/h3>\n