{"id":41040,"date":"2022-11-13T02:08:35","date_gmt":"2022-11-13T02:08:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/?page_id=41040"},"modified":"2026-05-05T16:26:43","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T20:26:43","slug":"marktforschung-fur-quantencomputer","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.sisinternational.com\/de\/sachverstand\/marktforschung-fur-quantencomputer\/","title":{"rendered":"Quantum Computing Market Research for Industrial Buyers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Marktforschung f\u00fcr Quantencomputer<\/span><\/h1>\n
\"SIS<\/figure>\n<\/p>\n
\n

Quantum Computing is a type of computing. It uses concepts from Quantum Physics to solve complex problems. The concepts in this type of computing are Superposition and entanglement. Superposition is where the quantum particles exist in two possible states at the same time. Entanglements mean that the particles connect.<\/p>\n

Warum ist Quantencomputing wichtig?<\/h2>\n

Quantencomputing verleiht dem Computer mehr Rechenleistung. Dadurch k\u00f6nnen diese Computer einige Aufgaben besser und schneller erledigen als ein klassischer Computer. Au\u00dferdem verbrauchen sie weniger Energie.<\/p>\n

Klassische Computer kodieren Daten in Einheiten, die Bits genannt werden und die Werte 1 und 0 haben k\u00f6nnen. Diese Computer speichern die Daten nie gleichzeitig als 1 und 0. Aus diesem Grund begrenzen Bits die Art und Weise, wie Computer mit Daten arbeiten k\u00f6nnen. Quantencomputer sind anders. Sie verwenden eine Einheit namens Quantenbits oder Qubits, um Daten zu kodieren. Qubits bestehen aus Quantenteilchen. Diese Teilchen existieren in \u00dcberlagerung. Wenn die Daten also kodiert werden, k\u00f6nnen die Qubits gleichzeitig die Werte 1 und 0 haben. Sie k\u00f6nnen mehr Daten speichern und mehr Informationen verarbeiten. F\u00fcr einen Quantencomputer ist es beispielsweise ein Leichtes, ein komplexes Problem zu l\u00f6sen. Er kann viele Berechnungen gleichzeitig ausf\u00fchren, um die Antwort zu erhalten. Klassische Computer f\u00fchren immer nur eine m\u00f6gliche L\u00f6sung gleichzeitig aus.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Quantum Computing Market Research: How Industrial Leaders Build the Investment Case<\/h1>\n

Quantum computing has crossed from physics laboratory into procurement conversations at Fortune 500 industrial firms. Logistics planners, materials scientists, and chemical engineers now ask vendors when fault-tolerant systems will solve problems classical hardware cannot. Quantum Computing Market Research gives operating leaders the evidence to separate near-term commercial value from speculative timelines, and to commit capital with confidence.<\/p>\n

The opportunity is concrete. IBM, Google Quantum AI, IonQ, Quantinuum, Rigetti, PsiQuantum, and D-Wave have moved from qubit-count milestones to error-corrected logical qubits, hybrid cloud access, and industry-specific solver libraries. Industrial buyers no longer evaluate the technology in isolation. They evaluate it against bill of materials optimization, predictive maintenance sizing, and supplier qualification audits where quantum-inspired algorithms already produce measurable lift.<\/p>\n

Why Quantum Computing Market Research Matters Now for Industrial Strategy<\/h2>\n

Three structural shifts have compressed the planning horizon. First, hyperscaler partnerships through Amazon Braket, Microsoft Azure Quantum, and Google Cloud have made qubit access an OpEx line, removing the capital barrier that once delayed pilots. Second, the U.S. CHIPS Act, the EU Quantum Flagship, and similar programs in Japan, the UK, Australia, and Singapore have aligned public funding with industrial use cases in materials, defense, and energy. Third, post-quantum cryptography standards from NIST have forced security teams into the conversation, pulling quantum onto the enterprise risk register.<\/p>\n

Industrial firms that wait for fault tolerance miss the value already accessible through quantum annealing and variational algorithms. Volkswagen has tested traffic flow optimization on D-Wave systems. Airbus has run wing-loading simulations through hybrid quantum solvers. ExxonMobil has worked with IBM on routing maritime fleets. The pattern is clear. Early movers are not betting on the long-term winner. They are building the internal talent, vendor relationships, and benchmarking discipline that will determine who captures value when the technology matures.<\/p>\n

What Effective Quantum Computing Market Research Reveals<\/h2>\n

Surface-level reports rank vendors by qubit count. Operating leaders need a different set of inputs. They need to know which problems map to which architectures, which vendors will survive consolidation, which talent pools can be hired against, and which corridors of the supply chain will be disrupted first.<\/p>\n

According to SIS International Research, industrial buyers consistently underestimate the gap between vendor demonstrations and production-grade workloads, and the firms that close that gap fastest treat quantum procurement as a structured supplier qualification audit rather than a science experiment.<\/span><\/span> The leading practice is to evaluate hardware modalities (superconducting, trapped-ion, photonic, neutral-atom, annealing) against problem class, error rates, gate fidelity, and total cost of ownership over a five-year horizon, not against marketing benchmarks.<\/p>\n

Strong Quantum Computing Market Research delivers four outputs. A use-case heat map ranking applications by quantum advantage timeline. A vendor capability matrix scored on hardware roadmap, software stack, and ecosystem depth. A talent and geography assessment covering quantum-literate engineering hubs in Boston, Munich, Waterloo, Delft, Tel Aviv, and Sydney. A risk register covering cryptographic exposure and supply chain dependencies on rare materials such as helium-3 and high-purity silicon-28.<\/p>\n

The Use Cases Driving Industrial Adoption<\/h2>\n

Five problem classes show the strongest near-term pull in industrial markets.<\/p>\n

Combinatorial optimization.<\/strong> Route planning, factory scheduling, and warehouse slotting optimization sit at the front of the queue. Quantum-inspired solvers running on classical hardware already produce gains, and the workflow transfers directly to quantum annealers as fidelity improves.<\/p>\n

Materials and chemistry simulation.<\/strong> Battery chemistry benchmarking, catalyst discovery, and polymer design are the highest-value targets. BASF, Bosch, Mitsubishi Chemical, and Boeing have funded quantum chemistry programs because the energy required to simulate molecular systems classically rises exponentially with system size.<\/p>\n

Machine learning acceleration.<\/strong> Quantum machine learning shows promise in anomaly detection for predictive maintenance and in pattern recognition for installed base analytics. The advantage is narrow today, but the integration cost is low because models run on hybrid stacks.<\/p>\n

Risk and pricing simulation.<\/strong> Monte Carlo workloads in derivatives pricing, insurance reserving, and capital adequacy testing show quadratic speedup potential, drawing financial subsidiaries of industrial conglomerates into early adoption.<\/p>\n

Cryptographic migration.<\/strong> Every firm with long-lived data, defense contractors, automotive OEMs, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and infrastructure operators, faces a harvest-now-decrypt-later threat. Post-quantum cryptography migration is the one workstream where delay creates measurable liability.<\/p>\n

The SIS Approach to Quantum Computing Market Research<\/h2>\n

SIS International’s B2B expert interview programs across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific consistently surface the same insight: industrial buyers value vendor candor about timeline uncertainty more than they value optimistic roadmaps, and procurement teams that interview end users at peer firms close vendor selection cycles 30 to 40 percent faster than those that rely on analyst ranking alone.<\/span> This is why structured primary research outperforms syndicated reports in this category.<\/p>\n

SIS deploys four methodologies for quantum engagements. Competitive intelligence on hardware and software vendors, including private firms outside public coverage. Market entry assessments for quantum software startups targeting industrial verticals. B2B expert interviews with CTOs, chief data officers, and quantum program leads at Fortune 500 buyers. Voice of Customer programs for vendors testing pricing, packaging, and support models. Each is calibrated to the buyer’s decision, not to a generic market sizing template.<\/p>\n

A Framework for Sequencing Quantum Investment<\/h2>\n

The SIS Quantum Readiness Matrix sorts industrial use cases on two axes: quantum advantage horizon (near, medium, long) and internal capability gap (low, medium, high). Near-horizon, low-gap workloads such as logistics optimization belong in pilot now. Long-horizon, high-gap workloads such as full molecular simulation belong in a watchlist with annual review. Medium cases drive the talent and partnership decisions that separate leaders from followers.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Use Case<\/th>\nAdvantage Horizon<\/th>\nCapability Gap<\/th>\nRecommended Posture<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Logistics and routing<\/td>\nNear<\/td>\nLow<\/td>\nActive pilot<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Predictive maintenance ML<\/td>\nNear<\/td>\nMedium<\/td>\nHybrid pilot<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Battery and catalyst chemistry<\/td>\nMedium<\/td>\nHigh<\/td>\nPartnership and talent build<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cryptographic migration<\/td>\nNear<\/td>\nMedium<\/td>\nMandatory program<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Full fault-tolerant simulation<\/td>\nLong<\/td>\nHigh<\/td>\nWatchlist<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n

Source: SIS International Research<\/em><\/p>\n

What Separates Leading Industrial Adopters<\/h2>\n

The firms extracting value share three behaviors. They run multi-vendor benchmarks on real production data rather than synthetic problems. They embed quantum literacy in procurement and engineering, not only in R&D. They treat the cryptographic migration as a board-level program with a defined sunset for vulnerable algorithms.<\/p>\n

SIS International’s analysis of industrial technology adoption cycles indicates that the buyers who commission independent Quantum Computing Market Research before vendor selection avoid the lock-in patterns that defined early cloud computing procurement, where switching costs compounded faster than capability gains.<\/span> The lesson from cloud transfers cleanly. Architecture decisions made early shape the next decade of cost and flexibility.<\/p>\n

The Decision Ahead<\/h2>\n

Quantum Computing Market Research is no longer a scouting exercise for the office of the CTO. It is an input to capital allocation, supplier strategy, and security posture across the industrial enterprise. The firms that commission rigorous primary research now will buy better, build faster, and avoid the cryptographic exposure that will define the next compliance cycle. The window to set the agenda, rather than react to it, is open.<\/p>\n

\u00dcber SIS International<\/h2>\n

SIS International<\/a> bietet quantitative, qualitative und strategische Forschung an. Wir liefern Daten, Tools, Strategien, Berichte und Erkenntnisse zur Entscheidungsfindung. Wir f\u00fchren auch Interviews, Umfragen, Fokusgruppen und andere Methoden und Ans\u00e4tze der Marktforschung durch. Kontakt<\/a> f\u00fcr Ihr n\u00e4chstes Marktforschungsprojekt.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n

\n

Related SIS Resources<\/h3>\n